Originally posted by ferneyhoughgelie
Amadeus and Mozart
Collapse
X
-
Last edited by Eine Alpensinfonie; 06-07-13, 09:50.
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostIt's strange that he signed himself using what was effectively a false name, when he had 5 to choose from, the middle one being Wolfgangusm
One point which I think most (all?) biographers have missed is that the baptismal register, being an official church document, was written in Latin. So when the name is found written as 'Johañes Chrysost: Wolfgangus Theophilus' those weren't the actual names given but Latin translations (Leopold's name appears as 'Leopoldus'). A letter from Leopold written a few months later (not in Anderson, I think) gave the name as Joañes Chrisostomus, Wolfgang. Gottlieb.' His godfather was Johann Gottlieb Pergmayer - and his name is also written as 'Theophilus' in the register.
In a letter of 31 October1771 to his father, Wolfgang (aged 15) signed himself:
Joannes*** Chrisostomus Sigismundus** Wolfgang* Gottlieb Mozart
* Today is my name-day! **That is my confirmation name! *** January 27th is my birthday!It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostDoes anyone know Rimski's opera "Mozart and Salieri" based on the myth perpetuated in Amadeus?[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostAnd according to Georg Knepler he used the name 'Amadeus' on three occasions, but I don't think he ever used either form on its own: he used the form 'Wolfgang Amadé'.
One point which I think most (all?) biographers have missed is that the baptismal register, being an official church document, was written in Latin. So when the name is found written as 'Johañes Chrysost: Wolfgangus Theophilus' those weren't the actual names given but Latin translations (Leopold's name appears as 'Leopoldus'). A letter from Leopold written a few months later (not in Anderson, I think) gave the name as Joañes Chrisostomus, Wolfgang. Gottlieb.' His godfather was Johann Gottlieb Pergmayer - and his name is also written as 'Theophilus' in the register.
In a letter of 31 October1771 to his father, Wolfgang (aged 15) signed himself:
Joannes*** Chrisostomus Sigismundus** Wolfgang* Gottlieb Mozart
* Today is my name-day! **That is my confirmation name! *** January 27th is my birthday!
Comment
-
-
The main contemporary source for Salieri's 'confession' that he had poisoned Mozart is Beethoven's 'conversation books', the books guests wrote in to communicate with him after he had become deaf. Several people reported that the rumour was rife in Vienna that Salieri had confessed and was haunted by the thought that he had 'poisoned Mozart'. S. reported then to be pretty much insane. I suspect that the insanity caused the 'confession' rather than that the insanity was caused by the perception of 'guilt'.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostThe main contemporary source for Salieri's 'confession' that he had poisoned Mozart is Beethoven's 'conversation books', the books guests wrote in to communicate with him after he had become deaf. Several people reported that the rumour was rife in Vienna that Salieri had confessed and was haunted by the thought that he had 'poisoned Mozart'. S. reported then to be pretty much insane. I suspect that the insanity caused the 'confession' rather than that the insanity was caused by the perception of 'guilt'.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Posthis play investigates what might have caused such an insane confession.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
I saw the play again tonite, at a local summer stock performance, pretty well done actually but a lot of competition from buzzing and biting mosquitos. I prefer the play to the movie, which shifts the emphasis from Salieri to Mozart.
How factual is the portrayal of W.A.? Based on the Solomon biography that I finished a few months ago, probably not very. Mozart had his silly side and also his egotistical side but he was a complex person, as most of us are, and that just doesn't come through in the play. However, the original intent was to see Mozart through the eyes of Salieri, not necessarily as a person in full.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View PostMozart had his silly side and also his egotistical side but he was a complex person, as most of us are, and that just doesn't come through in the play. However, the original intent was to see Mozart through the eyes of Salieri, not necessarily as a person in full.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
Comment