Amadeus and Mozart

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Eine Alpensinfonie
    Host
    • Nov 2010
    • 20576

    #31
    Originally posted by ferneyhoughgelie

    Yes; Amadè was how Mozart signed his name - the apotheosis into "Amadeus" occured long after his death.
    It's strange that he signed himself using what was effectively a false name, when he had 5 to choose from, the middle one being Wolfgangus.
    Last edited by Eine Alpensinfonie; 06-07-13, 09:50.

    Comment

    • french frank
      Administrator/Moderator
      • Feb 2007
      • 30537

      #32
      Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
      It's strange that he signed himself using what was effectively a false name, when he had 5 to choose from, the middle one being Wolfgangusm
      And according to Georg Knepler he used the name 'Amadeus' on three occasions, but I don't think he ever used either form on its own: he used the form 'Wolfgang Amadé'.

      One point which I think most (all?) biographers have missed is that the baptismal register, being an official church document, was written in Latin. So when the name is found written as 'Johañes Chrysost: Wolfgangus Theophilus' those weren't the actual names given but Latin translations (Leopold's name appears as 'Leopoldus'). A letter from Leopold written a few months later (not in Anderson, I think) gave the name as Joañes Chrisostomus, Wolfgang. Gottlieb.' His godfather was Johann Gottlieb Pergmayer - and his name is also written as 'Theophilus' in the register.

      In a letter of 31 October1771 to his father, Wolfgang (aged 15) signed himself:

      Joannes*** Chrisostomus Sigismundus** Wolfgang* Gottlieb Mozart

      * Today is my name-day! **That is my confirmation name! *** January 27th is my birthday!
      It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

      Comment

      • ferneyhoughgeliebte
        Gone fishin'
        • Sep 2011
        • 30163

        #33
        Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
        Does anyone know Rimski's opera "Mozart and Salieri" based on the myth perpetuated in Amadeus?
        Strictly speaking (and apologies for not posting this on the "Pedants'" Thread) "based on the play by Pushkin which was based on the myth perpetuated in Amadeus".
        [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

        Comment

        • Pabmusic
          Full Member
          • May 2011
          • 5537

          #34
          Originally posted by french frank View Post
          And according to Georg Knepler he used the name 'Amadeus' on three occasions, but I don't think he ever used either form on its own: he used the form 'Wolfgang Amadé'.

          One point which I think most (all?) biographers have missed is that the baptismal register, being an official church document, was written in Latin. So when the name is found written as 'Johañes Chrysost: Wolfgangus Theophilus' those weren't the actual names given but Latin translations (Leopold's name appears as 'Leopoldus'). A letter from Leopold written a few months later (not in Anderson, I think) gave the name as Joañes Chrisostomus, Wolfgang. Gottlieb.' His godfather was Johann Gottlieb Pergmayer - and his name is also written as 'Theophilus' in the register.

          In a letter of 31 October1771 to his father, Wolfgang (aged 15) signed himself:

          Joannes*** Chrisostomus Sigismundus** Wolfgang* Gottlieb Mozart

          * Today is my name-day! **That is my confirmation name! *** January 27th is my birthday!
          A good point. But Theophilus is Latinised Greek (Amadeus would be Latin). Gottlieb of course is German.

          Comment

          • french frank
            Administrator/Moderator
            • Feb 2007
            • 30537

            #35
            Originally posted by Pabmusic View Post
            But Theophilus is Latinised Greek (Amadeus would be Latin).
            Indeed - see my Msg#23. I assume that Theophilus was how the church clerk latinised Gottlieb.
            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

            Comment

            • Pabmusic
              Full Member
              • May 2011
              • 5537

              #36
              Originally posted by french frank View Post
              Indeed - see my Msg#23. I assume that Theophilus was how the church clerk latinised Gottlieb.
              Ah yes. Makes sense.

              Comment

              • Eine Alpensinfonie
                Host
                • Nov 2010
                • 20576

                #37
                Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                Strictly speaking (and apologies for not posting this on the "Pedants'" Thread) "based on the play by Pushkin which was based on the myth perpetuated in Amadeus".

                Comment

                • french frank
                  Administrator/Moderator
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 30537

                  #38
                  The Pushkin poem/play is here (in English). Very short and worth reading if the subject interests.
                  It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                  Comment

                  • french frank
                    Administrator/Moderator
                    • Feb 2007
                    • 30537

                    #39
                    The main contemporary source for Salieri's 'confession' that he had poisoned Mozart is Beethoven's 'conversation books', the books guests wrote in to communicate with him after he had become deaf. Several people reported that the rumour was rife in Vienna that Salieri had confessed and was haunted by the thought that he had 'poisoned Mozart'. S. reported then to be pretty much insane. I suspect that the insanity caused the 'confession' rather than that the insanity was caused by the perception of 'guilt'.
                    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                    Comment

                    • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                      Gone fishin'
                      • Sep 2011
                      • 30163

                      #40
                      Originally posted by french frank View Post
                      The main contemporary source for Salieri's 'confession' that he had poisoned Mozart is Beethoven's 'conversation books', the books guests wrote in to communicate with him after he had become deaf. Several people reported that the rumour was rife in Vienna that Salieri had confessed and was haunted by the thought that he had 'poisoned Mozart'. S. reported then to be pretty much insane. I suspect that the insanity caused the 'confession' rather than that the insanity was caused by the perception of 'guilt'.
                      Yes, I believe this, too - so does Shaffer, I suspect, and his play investigates what might have caused such an insane confession. The play begins with the "chorus" whispering; spreading gossip: the citizens of Vienna "rifening" the rumour - the audience hears unvoiced whispering, then gradually "Mozart", "Salieri" and "poison" gradually emerge from the stage.
                      [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                      Comment

                      • french frank
                        Administrator/Moderator
                        • Feb 2007
                        • 30537

                        #41
                        Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                        his play investigates what might have caused such an insane confession.
                        There is evidence that Mozart himself thought that the symptoms he was displaying were those of poisoning. I would have thought it would only have needed Salieri's 'guilty conscience' at disliking Mozart, being jealous or not as helpful as he could have been in furthering his career to have fuelled an already ailing mind's obsession when Mozart died as he did - not quite a pauper but with no state recognition - that he had been in a measure responsible. That he also apparently denied it suggests that he went in and out of insanity. But Shaffer clearly wove a more complex psychological plot than that.
                        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                        Comment

                        • Eine Alpensinfonie
                          Host
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 20576

                          #42
                          Originally posted by french frank View Post
                          The Pushkin poem/play is here (in English). Very short and worth reading if the subject interests.
                          Thank you, ff. Greatly appreciated.

                          Comment

                          • richardfinegold
                            Full Member
                            • Sep 2012
                            • 7765

                            #43
                            I saw the play again tonite, at a local summer stock performance, pretty well done actually but a lot of competition from buzzing and biting mosquitos. I prefer the play to the movie, which shifts the emphasis from Salieri to Mozart.
                            How factual is the portrayal of W.A.? Based on the Solomon biography that I finished a few months ago, probably not very. Mozart had his silly side and also his egotistical side but he was a complex person, as most of us are, and that just doesn't come through in the play. However, the original intent was to see Mozart through the eyes of Salieri, not necessarily as a person in full.

                            Comment

                            • french frank
                              Administrator/Moderator
                              • Feb 2007
                              • 30537

                              #44
                              Originally posted by richardfinegold View Post
                              Mozart had his silly side and also his egotistical side but he was a complex person, as most of us are, and that just doesn't come through in the play. However, the original intent was to see Mozart through the eyes of Salieri, not necessarily as a person in full.
                              It's probably also worth emphasising that Mozart was 'famous' from about the age of 5, and dead before he was 36. Many of the impressions and anecdotes related about him by contemporaries were of a lad - a child even. Roughly half the letters in Anderson's edition of letters to or from Mozart were written before he was 22. And half his works, judging from the Koechel numbers, were written by then (K311 - piano sonata no 6 - was composed in 1777). He was probably about 25 when he composed the Gran Partita. The 'irritating laugh' appears to have been invented - I presume intended to say more about Salieri than Mozart.
                              It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X