Just because someone is a pompous shit (which the Honourable Member clearly is), that doesn't automatically give the Police the right to deprive him of his liberty.
what a paragraph .........
Collapse
X
-
You just have to watch (as one does) TV programmes of the "Police, Action, Video" type to see police-sanctioned footage of persons stopped by roadside patrols being told, "Right, the next time you use that word you'll be arrested", and then promptly being arrested, though the persons were just a bit wound up and not threatening or frightening anybody. WPCs are well used to this kind of thing. And we all know about policemen corroborating their notes. The issue therefore is, what, if he didn't use those words, were the words uttered by Mitchell?
Comment
-
Comment