Drama to be eradicated from Radio 3

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • french frank
    replied
    Originally posted by Belgrove View Post
    Feedback

    has just announced that, as a partial response to R3 dropping drama, R4 will be running a 90 minute drama on a monthly basis to be broadcast on Saturday afternoons. A possible alternative to the depleted content offered by R3 in that slot?
    Also some responses to changes on R3 and an interview with Tom McKinney.
    The emphasis did seem to be - and I had wondered about what 'drama on 4' would be like - on contemporary, especially written for radio, work. Unsurprisingly, the writing profession was pleased with the news. I didn't feel there was a huge commitment to 'world theatre', though there was a passing reference to stage plays. When all's said and done it's likely that R3 will be diminished whatever replaces Do3.

    Leave a comment:


  • Belgrove
    replied
    Feedback

    has just announced that, as a partial response to R3 dropping drama, R4 will be running a 90 minute drama on a monthly basis to be broadcast on Saturday afternoons. A possible alternative to the depleted content offered by R3 in that slot?
    Also some responses to changes on R3 and an interview with Tom McKinney.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ein Heldenleben
    replied
    Originally posted by Cockney Sparrow View Post

    Did the exam fees go down? I suspect not - so they pocket the fee for less cost and effort....... kerching
    No they didn’t I think . It’s also a nice earner for the teacher who now doubles up as recordist and invigilator whereas before the kids would be taken to the exam by the parent ( in my case doubling as unpaid ‘virtuoso’ accompanist)

    Leave a comment:


  • Cockney Sparrow
    replied
    Originally posted by Roslynmuse View Post

    Recording exams was brought in during the various lockdowns when 'live' examining was impossible. I am surprised it has persisted, to be honest; candidates may feel they have an advantage being able to record their pieces over and over again, but, as anyone who has made recordings knows, it's no advantage whatsoever when editing is not possible. Having an 'audience' of teacher or parent is a mixed blessing and no substitute for playing to an examiner. Agreed about quality of sound. I ended up doing a lot of teaching over Zoom during the pandemic and my heart sinks now whenever I get a request for an online lesson. And I do a lot of audition video viewing from abroad as part of my work - I have to really steel myself for a day of viewing, as the recorded sound quality is often so poor.
    Did the exam fees go down? I suspect not - so they pocket the fee for less cost and effort....... kerching

    Leave a comment:


  • smittims
    replied
    'Mind you , it's quite a skilled process'.

    So is picking safes , and about as honest...

    Leave a comment:


  • Ein Heldenleben
    replied
    Originally posted by Roslynmuse View Post

    Recording exams was brought in during the various lockdowns when 'live' examining was impossible. I am surprised it has persisted, to be honest; candidates may feel they have an advantage being able to record their pieces over and over again, but, as anyone who has made recordings knows, it's no advantage whatsoever when editing is not possible. Having an 'audience' of teacher or parent is a mixed blessing and no substitute for playing to an examiner. Agreed about quality of sound. I ended up doing a lot of teaching over Zoom during the pandemic and my heart sinks now whenever I get a request for an online lesson. And I do a lot of audition video viewing from abroad as part of my work - I have to really steel myself for a day of viewing, as the recorded sound quality is often so poor.
    What you’re saying echoes exactly what I’ve heard from another teacher. It’s also not good for your ears.

    re “red light fever” I’ve only experienced once when bizarrely I recorded (sound only) a piece by Agatha Christie for a TV film. She was quite a good pianist and the piece was full of right hand octaves.Knowing I could have take after take just made things worse . It’s that awful feeling that the producer and engineer just want to finish early and get some lunch . Thank God for digital editing.

    Incidentally with AI I reckon it would now be relatively easy( for a professional editor)to drop in an audio retake over a video recording thus making the exam eminently cheatable .Something similar is used all the time in drama to post dub dialogue that’s come out inaudible or poor quality on the location recording.
    Mind you it’s quite a skilled process.

    Leave a comment:


  • Roslynmuse
    replied
    Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post

    Even more shocking is the admissibility of video recordings in the grade exams. Unless the recording is done with professional quality microphones and by someone who knows about the art and craft of recording the sound is likely to be terrible. The piano is a notoriously difficult instrument to record well. Its impossibly to make any judgement of tone or pedalling even phrasing if it’s a compressed mobile phone job, It’s absolutely ridiculous.
    Recording exams was brought in during the various lockdowns when 'live' examining was impossible. I am surprised it has persisted, to be honest; candidates may feel they have an advantage being able to record their pieces over and over again, but, as anyone who has made recordings knows, it's no advantage whatsoever when editing is not possible. Having an 'audience' of teacher or parent is a mixed blessing and no substitute for playing to an examiner. Agreed about quality of sound. I ended up doing a lot of teaching over Zoom during the pandemic and my heart sinks now whenever I get a request for an online lesson. And I do a lot of audition video viewing from abroad as part of my work - I have to really steel myself for a day of viewing, as the recorded sound quality is often so poor.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ein Heldenleben
    replied
    Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post

    It came as a bit if a shock to learn that music diploma students no longer have to turn up to perform their pieces for the examiner in person, but perform online; surely this removes an aspect of performance that should be part of the process. Apparently they no longer need to prepare programme notes either.
    (Not sure if this applies to all instruments and exam boards and if it depends on where you live, though.)
    Even more shocking is the admissibility of video recordings in the grade exams. Unless the recording is done with professional quality microphones and by someone who knows about the art and craft of recording the sound is likely to be terrible. The piano is a notoriously difficult instrument to record well. Its impossibly to make any judgement of tone or pedalling even phrasing if it’s a compressed mobile phone job, It’s absolutely ridiculous.

    Leave a comment:


  • LMcD
    replied
    Originally posted by Ianbrowne View Post

    Glad you enjoyed the White Devil. Perhaps it's a personal opinion, but I think it is Webster's masterpiece and it knocks the socks of other Jacobean drama. The great thing about Radio 3 was that it gave me the chance to explore their other Jacobean dramas - The Spanish Tragedy, The Changeling, Women Beware Women, Duchess of Malfi and 'Tis Pity. And beyond that I started to read about Christopher Marlowe and read a little about the historical period. I guess the idea that great drama leads you onto other things is alien to the current BBC conception of what drama is. Sometimes you find a real turkey, It's a mad world my masters, for example, but that true of everything in life - some good things and some rubbish things.

    That is what I regret with this idiotic decision by the Director General - that new worlds of experience through radio drama will not open up to me again.
    I imagine the DG will mange to ensure that somebody else takes the blame.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pulcinella
    replied
    Originally posted by smittims View Post
    I think there's a warning here for live concerts too. Putting on staging of a play, like putting on a live concert of music involves a huge amount of effort and expense probably not appreciatied by many members of the public accustomed to choosing a video or recording at the touch of a button. One can only hope that enough people appreciate the value of live events , and being there, to keep trying. I know actors often stress the very different rewards fo live performance in front of a live audience, and despite all the difficulties regard it as the essential part of their art.
    It came as a bit if a shock to learn that music diploma students no longer have to turn up to perform their pieces for the examiner in person, but perform online; surely this removes an aspect of performance that should be part of the process. Apparently they no longer need to prepare programme notes either.
    (Not sure if this applies to all instruments and exam boards and if it depends on where you live, though.)

    Leave a comment:


  • smittims
    replied
    I think there's a warning here for live concerts too. Putting on staging of a play, like putting on a live concert of music involves a huge amount of effort and expense probably not appreciatied by many members of the public accustomed to choosing a video or recording at the touch of a button. One can only hope that enough people appreciate the value of live events , and being there, to keep trying. I know actors often stress the very different rewards fo live performance in front of a live audience, and despite all the difficulties regard it as the essential part of their art.

    Leave a comment:


  • french frank
    replied
    Meanwhile, out in the country:

    The number of plays and musicals staged by the UK's main subsidised theatres is down by almost a third.


    I'm personally less bothered about musicals, the vast majority of which are 'modern', but an art form whose history stretches back thousands of years?

    Leave a comment:


  • eighthobstruction
    replied
    ........yes, there was little chance of me reading Euripides without R3£

    Leave a comment:


  • Ianbrowne
    replied
    Originally posted by AuntDaisy View Post
    Why does "Gatsby in Harlem" have to be the example of R3 drama? And, quelle surprise, a certain Dr Who actor gets a mention.
    Why stick at a 90min slot? I enjoyed listening to the 2 hour "White Devil" this morning.

    Odious little toad Cost. Drama. Audience up! Waffle. Proms. Waffle. Drama. Not Classic FM. Waffle. Modernism. Waffle.

    He has no idea of what R3 used to be like.
    Glad you enjoyed the White Devil. Perhaps it's a personal opinion, but I think it is Webster's masterpiece and it knocks the socks of other Jacobean drama. The great thing about Radio 3 was that it gave me the chance to explore their other Jacobean dramas - The Spanish Tragedy, The Changeling, Women Beware Women, Duchess of Malfi and 'Tis Pity. And beyond that I started to read about Christopher Marlowe and read a little about the historical period. I guess the idea that great drama leads you onto other things is alien to the current BBC conception of what drama is. Sometimes you find a real turkey, It's a mad world my masters, for example, but that true of everything in life - some good things and some rubbish things.

    That is what I regret with this idiotic decision by the Director General - that new worlds of experience through radio drama will not open up to me again.

    Leave a comment:


  • AuntDaisy
    replied
    Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
    They can always come and visit me - I have over 1000 cassettes, many examples of programmes I recorded off R3 back in the good old days!

    And the BBC Archives hold even more - but it doesn't mean that his nibs (or others) access them or even look in old copies the Radio Times.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X