) could be that such an approach would over-concentrate on the European perspective at the expense of the cultures its colonsers tried to dominate and wipe out, but the time could be right for more literally enlightened perspectives on the place of the pre- and post-Enlightenment artistic artifact to come out in Radio 3 broadcast discussions. The question as to where and if these manifestations of what was once considered at their best to represent the epitome of history in our hierarchy of thinking needs rescuing, warts and all, from the false apologetics of far right ideology, when it is not pretending to populism.
Agree that all of it could (and perhaps should) be put in context whatever its date and origin.
some years back and confirmed by RW, the morning programmes get the biggest slice of the station's audience. This is not primarily because people like these programmes more than any others on offer, but because those hours are radio's peak listening time. In the past it's been recognised that CotW is a bit of a turn-off for the morning listeners which is why there's a bit of shuffling it between 9am and noon where it will do less damage. I presume the answer to the listening figures problem is to keep the mass audience programmes going for as long as possible. It's the only explanation I can think of, but it won't work.
Along with Schein, Scheidt, Schütz and Scheidemann?
Comment