Coronation Chicken

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • french frank
    Administrator/Moderator
    • Feb 2007
    • 30519

    #91
    Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
    Whether people are more realistic and hard headed as a result ……time to put in a call to Solomon on that one, I think.
    I feel people have turned a little mad. Never more true was Pascal's saying about all the troubles of mankind deriving from his inability to sit quietly in a room.
    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

    Comment

    • vinteuil
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 12957

      #92
      .

      ... I thought Gaby Hinsliff in The Guardian expressed it well :

      Most of us don’t care about the coronation, and attempts to whip up our support have already backfired, says Guardian columnist Gaby Hinsliff


      whereas this demonstrates how out of touch the whole farrago is -

      The King will wear layers of glittering garments, some of which were created for George V.




      .

      Comment

      • french frank
        Administrator/Moderator
        • Feb 2007
        • 30519

        #93
        Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
        .

        ... I thought Gaby Hinsliff in The Guardian expressed it well :

        Most of us don’t care about the coronation, and attempts to whip up our support have already backfired, says Guardian columnist Gaby Hinsliff


        .
        I preferred Zoe Williams piece about the pledge of allegiance being "nonsense" (or as I said "meaningless"). It's Theatre of the Absurd. But there seems to be quite a bit of False Consensus Effect here - people assuring others of what "people think" meaning what I think (and probably my circle of friends also thinks).
        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

        Comment

        • vinteuil
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 12957

          #94
          Originally posted by french frank View Post
          I preferred Zoe Williams piece about the pledge of allegiance being "nonsense" (or as I said "meaningless")
          ... yes, it was good -

          People will give voice to this absurd word salad and a chorus will go up from those of us who have been silent about the royals for years. The only thing I swear? There will be tears after this homage, writes Zoe Williams


          .

          Comment

          • eighthobstruction
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 6449

            #95
            ....well seeing as the pledge has gone down like a lead albatros....perhaps they might try public rtitual sacrifice of internet influencers at the several gates of London...I can see a lot of takers for that....
            bong ching

            Comment

            • Serial_Apologist
              Full Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 37861

              #96
              Originally posted by french frank View Post
              I feel people have turned a little mad. Never more true was Pascal's saying about all the troubles of mankind deriving from his inability to sit quietly in a room.
              Or just blotting up the prevailing idea expressed in most TV ads that we all have mental ages of around 7 years.

              (I really do mean this - compared with TV commercials 15 or 20 years ago, which, whatever trash they were promoting, at least had some resemblance to a desirable unreality and appeal to self-promotion. I have numerous examples on VHS tapes.)

              Comment

              • Pulcinella
                Host
                • Feb 2014
                • 11123

                #97
                Originally posted by french frank View Post
                I feel people have turned a little mad. Never more true was Pascal's saying about all the troubles of mankind deriving from his inability to sit quietly in a room.
                Three (silent?) cheers for The Society of Friends (aka Quakers), then.

                Comment

                • vinteuil
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 12957

                  #98
                  Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post
                  Three (silent?) cheers for The Society of Friends (aka Quakers), then.
                  ... tho' Pascal is understood to have meant that the man would be alone -

                  « Tout le malheur des hommes vient de ne savoir pas demeurer en repos, dans une chambre »

                  usually translated as - "All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone"

                  ( ... and I'm not sure that Pascal, an intense if particular Catholic, would necessarily approve of the Society of Friends... )

                  .

                  Comment

                  • Pulcinella
                    Host
                    • Feb 2014
                    • 11123

                    #99
                    Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                    ... tho' Pascal is understood to have meant that the man would be alone -

                    « Tout le malheur des hommes vient de ne savoir pas demeurer en repos, dans une chambre »

                    usually translated as - "All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone"

                    ( ... and I'm not sure that Pascal, an intense if particular Catholic, would necessarily approve of the Society of Friends... )

                    .
                    Thanks for that extra background!

                    Comment

                    • smittims
                      Full Member
                      • Aug 2022
                      • 4398

                      I was puzzled by Zoe Williams' calling the Royal Family 'illegible'. If she'd written 'ineligible' it would have made sense , though it might have been held to be libel.

                      Good point, though. We live in an age of extremes, but most of us are in the middle just wanting to get on with our lives. If we're not royalist we're labelled as anti-royalist.

                      At least I'm relieved to see no bunting or preparation for street-parties where I live.

                      Comment

                      • Serial_Apologist
                        Full Member
                        • Dec 2010
                        • 37861

                        Originally posted by smittims View Post
                        I was puzzled by Zoe Williams' calling the Royal Family 'illegible'. If she'd written 'ineligible' it would have made sense , though it might have been held to be libel.

                        Good point, though. We live in an age of extremes, but most of us are in the middle just wanting to get on with our lives. If we're not royalist we're labelled as anti-royalist.

                        At least I'm relieved to see no bunting or preparation for street-parties where I live.
                        No one among us ordinary folks could ever be said to have "read" the late Queen, though. And I'm not sure we can the present monarch. All part of maintaining the mystique.

                        Comment

                        • Bryn
                          Banned
                          • Mar 2007
                          • 24688

                          Originally posted by smittims View Post
                          I was puzzled by Zoe Williams' calling the Royal Family 'illegible'. If she'd written 'ineligible' it would have made sense , though it might have been held to be libel. . . .
                          Well, it was in The Grauniad, so a fair range of words might have been intended but misprinted.

                          Comment

                          • french frank
                            Administrator/Moderator
                            • Feb 2007
                            • 30519

                            Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                            ... tho' Pascal is understood to have meant that the man would be alone -

                            « Tout le malheur des hommes vient de ne savoir pas demeurer en repos, dans une chambre »
                            I deliberately omitted the word 'alone' because I didn't understand him to have said 'alone' - since he didn't say it. Two people in the same room sitting 'en repos' would have been quite acceptable, I think
                            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                            Comment

                            • Pulcinella
                              Host
                              • Feb 2014
                              • 11123

                              Originally posted by french frank View Post
                              I deliberately omitted the word 'alone' because I didn't understand him to have said 'alone' - since he didn't say it. Two people in the same room sitting 'en repos' would have been quite acceptable, I think
                              Maybe I should have sat both alone and 'en repos' a bit longer before responding to vint.

                              Comment

                              • french frank
                                Administrator/Moderator
                                • Feb 2007
                                • 30519

                                Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post
                                Maybe I should have sat both alone and 'en repos' a bit longer before responding to vint.
                                In fairness, all the online translations I read included the world 'alone', but it isn't in the original and I don't understand why it is included (though being the internet perhaps it only occurred once and all the others followed it). Pascal didn't say it and I took the principal idea to be the sitting quietly, perhaps the contemplation, the calm or tranquillity.
                                It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X