Ukraine

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bryn
    Banned
    • Mar 2007
    • 24688

    Originally posted by JasonPalmer View Post
    Putin now has an excuse to stop when he has reclaimed the bits he says belongs to Russia, spring offensive ..
    He's not reclaiming, he's attempting to further annexe another independent state's territory. The annexation of Crimea may have had some potential justification in the history of the USSR but that, too, was a major contravention of international law.

    Comment

    • JasonPalmer
      Full Member
      • Dec 2022
      • 826

      Putin sees things differently, he russias man of destiny...
      Annoyingly listening to and commenting on radio 3...

      Comment

      • french frank
        Administrator/Moderator
        • Feb 2007
        • 30254

        Originally posted by Dave2002 View Post
        Are these the articles you meant?

        It would be prudent for Kyiv to start thinking about a negotiated settlement, writes Jonathan Powell, who led negotiations in Northern Ireland. But fo...




        Is the Jonathan Powell who wrote the first article this former Labour Adviser? - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonath...abour_adviser)
        Yes and yes. Interesting that brother Charles Powell was adviser to M Thatcher! Must have been a bit like "Home with the Johnsons".
        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

        Comment

        • french frank
          Administrator/Moderator
          • Feb 2007
          • 30254

          Originally posted by Bryn View Post
          The annexation of Crimea may have had some potential justification in the history of the USSR .
          Which, in case anyone posting here hadn't noticed, no longer exists. The Russian Federation is not entitled to march into neighbouring independent countries and claim bits of them for its own.

          And it isn't absolutely necessary to constantly present the opposing point of view with assertions and no evidence IMVVVVVVHO, as Lord Gould might say!
          It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

          Comment

          • Bryn
            Banned
            • Mar 2007
            • 24688

            Originally posted by french frank View Post
            Which, in case anyone posting here hadn't noticed, no longer exists. The Russian Federation is not entitled to march into neighbouring independent countries and claim bits of them for its own.

            And it isn't absolutely necessary to constantly present the opposing point of view with assertions and no evidence IMVVVVVVHO, as Lord Gould might say!
            Indeed. I mentioned the USSR because it was during the time of its existence that, pretty much as an administrative convenience, Crimea was assigned to what is now the independent state of Ukraine. However, that was then and when Ukraine broke from the Soviet Union in 1991, Crimea was and remains, in international law, one of its component regions.

            Comment

            • JasonPalmer
              Full Member
              • Dec 2022
              • 826

              Putin is friends with a philosopher who has very different views on how Russia needs a strong man and an empire



              Edit

              "Halya Coynash of the Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group said that the influence of Dugin's "Eurasian ideology" on events in eastern Ukraine and on Russia's invasion of the Crimea was beyond any doubt.[92] According to Vincent Jauvert, Dugin's radical ideology became the basis for the internal and foreign policy of the Russian authorities.[93] "So Dugin is worth listening to, in order to understand to which fate the Kremlin is leading its country and the whole of Europe."[93]"
              Annoyingly listening to and commenting on radio 3...

              Comment

              • french frank
                Administrator/Moderator
                • Feb 2007
                • 30254

                Originally posted by JasonPalmer View Post
                Putin is friends with a philosopher who has very different views on how Russia needs a strong man and an empire
                We know all about Dugin. But the discussion is about Ukraine and its future. What Putin may want, contrary to the good of others, is not what matters.
                It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                Comment

                • Bryn
                  Banned
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 24688

                  Originally posted by french frank View Post
                  We know all about Dugin. But the discussion is about Ukraine and its future. What Putin may want, contrary to the good of others, is not what matters.
                  Indeed, though it is worth adding that it has been suggested that far from being a reliable friend, Putin ordered the car bomb attack which killed Dugin's daughter, who shared her father's fascist outlook. The intended target was held to have been Alexander Dugin, rather than his daughter who was famed for her pro-Putin reports from the Russian front in Ukraine.

                  Comment

                  • JasonPalmer
                    Full Member
                    • Dec 2022
                    • 826

                    Originally posted by french frank View Post
                    We know all about Dugin. But the discussion is about Ukraine and its future. What Putin may want, contrary to the good of others, is not what matters.

                    And yet...what he wants...matters
                    Annoyingly listening to and commenting on radio 3...

                    Comment

                    • french frank
                      Administrator/Moderator
                      • Feb 2007
                      • 30254

                      Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                      Indeed, though it is worth adding that it has been suggested that far from being a reliable friend, Putin ordered the car bomb attack which killed Dugin's daughter, who shared her father's fascist outlook. The intended target was held to have been Alexander Dugin, rather than his daughter who was famed for her pro-Putin reports from the Russian front in Ukraine.
                      It was certainly always more likely that Dugin was the intended victim, whatever the identity of the would-be assassins.
                      It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                      Comment

                      • JasonPalmer
                        Full Member
                        • Dec 2022
                        • 826

                        From what I heard it was Ukrainian special forces who were after the father.
                        Annoyingly listening to and commenting on radio 3...

                        Comment

                        • Bryn
                          Banned
                          • Mar 2007
                          • 24688

                          Originally posted by JasonPalmer View Post
                          From what I heard it was Ukrainian special forces who were after the father.
                          Quite as likely a false-flag operation by the FSB (a second attempt on their part to remove him). As to Ukrainian special forces, Darya herself could have been as likely a target, given her role as a Putin propagandist.

                          Comment

                          • HighlandDougie
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 3082

                            As a subscriber to 'Comment is Freed', this has just appeared in my inbox:

                            In his post on 7 January Lawrence Freedman concluded that “The question of what it takes to get Russia to abandon its war of conquest remains unanswered.”

                            Comment

                            • french frank
                              Administrator/Moderator
                              • Feb 2007
                              • 30254

                              Originally posted by HighlandDougie View Post
                              As a subscriber to 'Comment is Freed', this has just appeared in my inbox:

                              https://samf.substack.com/p/putins-t...m_medium=email
                              Lyne is probably right that a lasting peace requires a generational change in Russian leadership, though Putin is still a 'young' man - only 70.
                              It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                              Comment

                              • HighlandDougie
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 3082

                                Apologies to Historian but I received the below earlier - as ever, well worth reading

                                ‘With our backs to the wall and believing in the justice of our cause each one of us must fight on to the end. The safety of our homes and the freedom of mankind alike depend upon the conduct of each one of us at this critical moment.’

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X