A non sequitur, but some heartening singing from Ukraine...if you can log on to facebook, that is:
Ukraine
Collapse
X
-
We now have a clearer idea of Ukraine's position in the latest talks. Effectively, Ukraine would give up joining NATO in return for much stronger guarantees of immediate direct military support and a 'no-fly zone' in the face of any future attack. This would be enforced by a multi-national array of guarantor countries. The status of the Crimea would be the subject of 'consultations' over a long period, with further discussions about the two other regions previously taken from Ukraine. Ukraine would still be permitted to join the EU.
This is hopeful in that it could eventually lead to a ceasefire rather than a lengthy, ruinous war in Ukraine. Not sure how keen Putin would be to give up his gains in the South, but this may be a better deal that he would able to get later. He could probably 'sell it' to the Russian population.
I am not convinced by Russian overtures of de-escalation around Kyiv and Chernihiv, but would be happy to be proved wrong. That looks to me more like a means of extricating their forces from a worsening situation in the North.
Of course, this may all lead to nothing but it's considerable progress considering where we were a few days ago.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Historian View PostOf course, this may all lead to nothing but it's considerable progress considering where we were a few days ago.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostCan't help feeling that it's better to accept what Russia says at face value rather than 'show scepticism'. ... Are diplomats wily and devious???
Quite hard not to distrust what Putin's side say given their record. However, I would like to be wrong about this one.
(Delighted by the very practical concept of the simultaneous translator fly.)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Historian View PostWe now have a clearer idea of Ukraine's position in the latest talks. Effectively, Ukraine would give up joining NATO in return for much stronger guarantees of immediate direct military support and a 'no-fly zone' in the face of any future attack. This would be enforced by a multi-national array of guarantor countries. The status of the Crimea would be the subject of 'consultations' over a long period, with further discussions about the two other regions previously taken from Ukraine. Ukraine would still be permitted to join the EU.
This is hopeful in that it could eventually lead to a ceasefire rather than a lengthy, ruinous war in Ukraine. Not sure how keen Putin would be to give up his gains in the South, but this may be a better deal that he would able to get later. He could probably 'sell it' to the Russian population.
I am not convinced by Russian overtures of de-escalation around Kyiv and Chernihiv, but would be happy to be proved wrong. That looks to me more like a means of extricating their forces from a worsening situation in the North.
Of course, this may all lead to nothing but it's considerable progress considering where we were a few days ago.
For Ukraine, the damage to their infrastructure and people is immense and will take many years of re-building. Some form of Marshall Plan investment will surely be needed but thinking of the speed with which Germany and Japan re-built their shattered cities, it will be possible. As for Russia, who knows? It's very important that they are not knocked back into the Stone Age. If handled badly, the country could be another Germany post 1918 with all that that might entail for the future. Russia, post Putin, post war, eventually needs to come into the European family of nations and become a civilised country instead of endlessly repeating its history."The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Petrushka View PostI share your views here but it would, as I see it, and if true, be an utterly humiliating defeat for Putin. So much so, in fact, that I'm wondering if Putin hasn't already been sidelined, or even been 'disappeared'. The Russians are in an ever increasing predicament; in the north, their armies are facing possible annihilation; the cost of the war (did I read a figure of $5billion dollars a day?) is unsustainable; sanctions and the cost of the war are crippling the Russian economy. Allied to this is the cost of reparations for the massive damage to Ukraine. The war is totally unwinnable by Russia and was from the start. You have to ask if it was worthwhile in any meaningful way.
For Ukraine, the damage to their infrastructure and people is immense and will take many years of re-building. Some form of Marshall Plan investment will surely be needed but thinking of the speed with which Germany and Japan re-built their shattered cities, it will be possible. As for Russia, who knows? It's very important that they are not knocked back into the Stone Age. If handled badly, the country could be another Germany post 1918 with all that that might entail for the future. Russia, post Putin, post war, eventually needs to come into the European family of nations and become a civilised country instead of endlessly repeating its history.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View PostI don’t think Russia will suffer as Germany did under the Versailles treaty. They probably won’t have to make financial restitution to Ukraine, and the World wants to do business with them. Withdrawal of sanctions will be part of Putin’s “victory “ to sell to the Russian people
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Petrushka View PostThe war is totally unwinnable by Russia and was from the start. You have to ask if it was worthwhile in any meaningful way.
However, I don't think many people were predicting a stalemate (and potentially worse) when Russia invaded. If Putin's assessment of relative strengths had been accurate then the war could have been over by now. That would depend on the extent of his aims, but a scenario of a swift capture of Kiev and the supplanting of Zelensky was seen as more than likely by many analysts when Russia first invaded.
Let us hope that Ukraine is rebuilt swiftly when the war is over and that Russia is able to enter happier times sooner rather than later.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Historian View PostAgree with lots of what you say. It would be good to focus sanctions on Putin and his direct supporters as much as possible, although we should not underestimate his support among the 'ordinary' Russians.
However, I don't think many people were predicting a stalemate (and potentially worse) when Russia invaded. If Putin's assessment of relative strengths had been accurate then the war could have been over by now. That would depend on the extent of his aims, but a scenario of a swift capture of Kiev[sic] and the supplanting of Zelensky was seen as more than likely by many analysts when Russia first invaded.
Let us hope that Ukraine is rebuilt swiftly when the war is over and that Russia is able to enter happier times sooner rather than later.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostI am reminded of an elderly German couple I met a few miles outside Tenby, back in 1974. The husband had been a prisoner of war and in that situation, worked as a farmhand in the area. After the war, he sent for his then young wife and they settled in a small cottage there, and eventually while continuing to work as a farmhand, built up a smallholding. I interviewed them in connection with a "learn from the people, learn from the past" project. Both related how they had supported Hiller in the 1930s and only much later learned of his excesses, a revelation that helped them decide to settle in Wales. I can well imagine that many (most) Russians find themselves in a similarly uninformed situation regarding Putin and his regime.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostI am reminded of an elderly German couple I met a few miles outside Tenby, back in 1974. The husband had been a prisoner of war and in that situation, worked as a farmhand in the area. After the war, he sent for his then young wife and they settled in a small cottage there, and eventually while continuing to work as a farmhand, built up a smallholding. I interviewed them in connection with a "learn from the people, learn from the past" project. Both related how they had supported Hiller in the 1930s and only much later learned of his excesses, a revelation that helped them decide to settle in Wales. I can well imagine that many (most) Russians find themselves in a similarly uninformed situation regarding Putin and his regime.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mahlerfan View PostBut surely what Hiller did can't be considered equivalent to Putin invading Ukraine, even though that's bad enough.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View PostThe media here is depicting the Russian pullback around Kviv as being of necessity, the Military leaders being fearful of their conscript Army being encircled and surrendering
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostThere have been some reports of significant numbers not only surrendering but switching sides. Perhaps a reflection of the closeness of the two nations that did not come into Putin's calculations.
Comment
-
Comment