The best thing to do is step up the sanctions against Russia. This will have the best impact.
I have to say that I am really surprised how much worse Trump is than last time....that was bad enough. Time for UK to part ways with America and align more with Europe. I also think we need to get Chinese support in the likelihood of America aggression. It may be unpalatable but I cannot see another option.
Ukraine
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by eighthobstruction View Post
Under external threat we start from a first principle of defending national sovereignty because that's all we have to go on: the motives of any potential attacker take second place. This all reminds me of the parable (attributed to the Buddha put equally pertinent here) of the man dying from an arrow through his heart, who nevertheless refuses to have it removed until he has been informed of all there is to know about his attacker - their age, sex, place of birth, education, beliefs, motivation, etc.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by eighthobstruction View Post
....I think it is a Kissinger thing....an ego thing....(an out in the cold thing)....
I do like this defacto caveat ref negotiations - that if as a back stop "should Russia break a peace", Ukraine would automatically get NATO membership....I'm happy for rfg to post "get real"....
Leave a comment:
-
-
What would I give up to allow UK to reach 3% Defence Spending....I would give up my Winter Fuel Payment - whoops that's gone already......Um, I would give up the pertinent patching of previous patches on local road potholes.....
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
... yes, not helpful.
(- I was wondering if it was an age thing - but he's younger than me (so that can't be the case))
I do like this defacto caveat ref negotiations - that if as a back stop "should Russia break a peace", Ukraine would automatically get NATO membership....I'm happy for rfg to post "get real"....
Leave a comment:
-
-
"...millions of American hearts swelled with overflowing pride today to watch President Trump put Zelenskyy in his place." [Stephen Miller] (or Trump puts President Zelenskyy &c ...' )
Big boy hits small boy and crowds cheer.
The problem for 'the Europeans' is that many of the states (inside and outside the EU) are tiny and several are comparatively poor.
Leave a comment:
-
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View Post
All? Triple???
,,,,I don't usually read Bloomberg as a source, but they have been good on the weekend Euro Summit....Finish PM Stubb has been very good (and very good English) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xc6YWZs7vmoLast edited by eighthobstruction; 03-03-25, 15:24.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View PostAll that I am trying to say is that perhaps if the Europeans can triple their spending and the US contributes about a quarter of previous that perhaps Ukraine can eake out survival.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View Post
Not clear what is being compared here. These are the BBC Verify figures placed in context. The US may claim to be the biggest single donor but is also the biggest state.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crew8y7pwd5o
Leave a comment:
-
-
....I heard via Times Radio : that minimum 100k soldiers might be required to keep a peace line in Ukraine - should a peace agreement be signed .....approx 3 x 30k (30k imn field , 30k readying to go +training, 30k resting after being in the field)....https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czep44jn9jyo
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View PostFwiw I’m unable to cut and paste the links but the UK and Germany appear to have provided 14B and 17B Euros respectively in direct aid to Ukraine in the last 3 yrs; the US roughly 160 billion. As we know these amounts have kept Ukraine afloat at a terrible human cost. If the EU were to triple their contribution and the US were to retain 25% of present support even that looks inadequate. Given present political realities it’s hard to see more support than that being offered .
The only viable solution I see is for the EU to put in place thousands of peacekeepers as human shields, and then hope that all participants in NATO would honor their commitments if they are attacked. Perhaps that would be a future US Administration
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment: