Ukraine

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • eighthobstruction
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 6562

    ....anyone been listening to/watching Jeffery Sachs views on cause (USA caused it, "it was started as a proxy war") But the war will be over soon and Russia will not invade Europe - Stop Russiaphobia , the expansion of EU led to a deadly expansion of NATO (NATO not needed), but EU should have it's own separate security structure and foreign policy (introduction about 10 minutes) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXGYZsA-cCA
    Last edited by eighthobstruction; 05-03-25, 13:05.
    bong ching

    Comment

    • richardfinegold
      Full Member
      • Sep 2012
      • 7932

      How much has each country given to Ukraine? The U.S. provided the highest bilateral aid to Ukraine as of June 2024, at over 67 billion euros.


      fwiw, this is where I derived the aid data to Ukraine. The link may not work but I just brought up by typing the entire url. Tripling donations from EU countries sounds like a lot, but the figure of $48 billion euros over three years provides some context. (I can't help note that this is a bit more than Elon Musk spent for Twitter). Yes, a great deal of assistance to resettling refugees has been given that are probably not reflected here. fwiw we also have many Ukranian refugees. They are ubiquitous in Chicago and in New York Ukranians have actually out populated areas that were formerly Russian enclaves, such as Brighton Beach. In Detroit large areas that were formerly Polish ethnically are now Ukranian. And those are just areas that I am personally familiar with.

      Hopefully, given the fact that Zelensky now appears to be knuckling under to our Clown In Chief, US Aid will be preserved at some manageable level.

      None of this is ideal. I''m just speculating and hoping for Ukraine to survive. Hopefully the Russians will back off for a while militarily. Also hopefully Putin and Trump depart the scene over the next decade. What else can we wish for?
      It's a tragedy that if present battle lines are frozen as the foundation of a cease fire that Russia will be rewarded with ill gotten gains. It's useful to remember that at the onset of the war all predictions were that the country would be completely overrun. And Russia has definitely paid a price. Their military is revealed to be a Piper Tiger that requires propping up from the likes of North Korea and Iran to achieve a limited victory over a much weaker neighbor. Trying to imagine the Russians projecting power further away from their landmass is difficult.

      Comment

      • eighthobstruction
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 6562

        ....seems to work....

        ....Sachs message seemed to be "Russia means you no harm"...."EU, separate from US, and arm yourself to the teeth"...(I simplify)....

        ....it is interesting that these rare earth mines appear now to be in Russian held regions....and the reports and estimations of quantity and worth were created by Russians pre Putin....( though I have also heard from Ukrainians the deposits are actually bonafide)
        Last edited by eighthobstruction; 05-03-25, 14:41.
        bong ching

        Comment

        • Serial_Apologist
          Full Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 38285

          Originally posted by eighthobstruction View Post
          ....seems to work....

          ....Sachs message seemed to be "Russia means you no harm"...."EU, separate from US, and arm yourself to the teeth"...(I simplify)....

          ....it is interesting that these rare earth mines appear now to be in Russian held regions....and the reports and estimations of quantity and worth were created by Russians pre Putin....( though I have also heard from Ukrainians the deposits are actually bonafide)
          Richard's "projected power" would in more probability consist in long-range shell, missile and drone firings than land or maritime invasions - so what are "we" doing building aircraft carriers - unless as some Keynsian jobs creation venture to pay good wages to then spend in retail. But the rate at which the speed of developments are drastically changing any picture to be reacted to forces one to think ever more drastically oneself - the latest news that arch-hypocrite Reeves now intends massive slashings on the welfare budget forces one into contemplating joining any burgeoning anti-war movement... What's to lose either way? there won't be much freedom left to defend or prospects for adequately funded retirement for those earmarked for service, let alone Net Zero and a habitable planet, once any of the existing and aspiring populist parties join the all-on-board belligerence bandwagon.

          Comment

          • Dave2002
            Full Member
            • Dec 2010
            • 18145

            Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post

            More and more Russian scamming of Trump supporters, if there's such a thing as poetic justice!
            I've obviously not kept up.
            Seems that RSRE was finally released for housing - but hopefully the expertise and functions of those who worked there - has not gone wasted and there are similarly very bright workers, with appropriate support and equipment distributed around the UK.

            There have been agreements about information/data sharing between countries which presumably worked "more or less well" [with some dubous problem areas] in the past.
            If things are going to get more muddy, then ... perhaps no further comment for the while.

            The Royal Signals and Radar Establishment (RSRE) was a scientific research establishment based in the UK that operated under the Ministry of Defence. It was located primarily at Malvern in Worcestershire, England, with a number of satellite sites around the country. The RSRE motto was Ubique Sentio, latin for “I sense everywhere”. In 1976, the … Continue reading "Royal Signals and Radar Establishment, Malvern"


            Comment

            • eighthobstruction
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 6562

              Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post

              Richard's "projected power" would in more probability consist in long-range shell, missile and drone firings than land or maritime invasions - so what are "we" doing building aircraft carriers - unless as some Keynsian jobs creation venture to pay good wages to then spend in retail. But the rate at which the speed of developments are drastically changing any picture to be reacted to forces one to think ever more drastically oneself - the latest news that arch-hypocrite Reeves now intends massive slashings on the welfare budget forces one into contemplating joining any burgeoning anti-war movement... What's to lose either way? there won't be much freedom left to defend or prospects for adequately funded retirement for those earmarked for service, let alone Net Zero and a habitable planet, once any of the existing and aspiring populist parties join the all-on-board belligerence bandwagon.
              ....Sounds like a episode of Star Wars....all away to the Death Planet to seek NetZero....soon you S-A you will just be an old service drone with an reconditioned parts....
              bong ching

              Comment

              • french frank
                Administrator/Moderator
                • Feb 2007
                • 30908

                Originally posted by richardfinegold View Post
                https://www.statista.com/statistics/...id-to-ukraine/

                Tripling donations from EU countries sounds like a lot, but the figure of $48 billion euros over three years provides some context.
                But the €48.94bn came from the EU institutions and commission, didn't it? As I read it, the separate EU countries donated (E&OE) a further €64.16bn and the non EU Europeans (UK, Norway, Switzerland, Iceland) donated another €​19.13bn. No?

                "Since the start of the war, the EU and our Member States have made available close to $145 billion* in financial, military, humanitarian, and refugee assistance, of which 65% have been provided as grants or in-kind support and 35% in the form of highly concessional loans.​"

                Last updated March 24, 2025. To view a PDF version, please click here. The European Union (EU) and our 27 Member States remain united and determined in our unprecedented support for Ukraine. Since the start of the war, the EU and our Member States have made available close to $149 billion* in financial, military, humanitarian, and refugee assistance, of which 65% have been provided as grants or in-kind support and 35% in the form of highly concessional loans.  In addition, in February 2024, European leaders agreed to commit up to $54 billion until 2027 for the Ukraine Facility to support Ukraine's recovery, reconstruction and modernization, as well as its efforts to carry out reforms as part of its accession path to the EU. Furthermore, in October 2024, the EU and G7 partners agreed to collectively provide loans of $50 billion to support Ukraine's budgetary, military and reconstruction needs, financed by extraordinary revenues from immobilized Russian sovereign assets. The EU will contribute $20 billion. The first $4.2 billion was disbursed in 2025. This will bring our commitments to date to close to $194 billion.  In July 2024, the EU made available the first $1.6 billion generated from immobilized Russian assets, $1.5 billion for military support through the EPF $109 million for energy support through the Ukraine Facility.  In December 2023, European leaders endorsed opening accession negotiations with Ukraine. Ukraine has shown remarkable determination and progress on reforms, including anti-corruption, while defending its country and its people against Russia’s aggression. Ukraine is already a member of the European family and we will continue supporting Ukraine every step of the way on its path to EU membership.  Since the start of Russia’s illegal war, we have worked in lockstep with the United States and other partners to impose massive sanctions on Russia, its military, and its economy, as well as to isolate Russia internationally, in spite of their negative effects on Europe’s economy.  The EU also moved at lightning speed to diversify our energy supplies and decouple from Russian fossil fuels, banning Russian coal and oil imports and drastically reducing gas imports. The U.S. commitment to support Europe in substituting U.S. LNG for the majority of imported Russian gas has been instrumental in derailing Putin’s plans. Collective EU and EU Member State support to Ukraine includes: Close to $77 billion in financial and budgetary support and in humanitarian and emergency assistance. This support is as essential as military assistance to ensure Ukraine’s success on the battlefield. It allows Ukraine to keep paying wages and pensions and maintain essential public services, such as hospitals, schools, and housing for relocated people. It also ensures macroeconomic stability, and helps restore critical infrastructure destroyed. It includes: $31.5 billion of financial assistance to Ukraine in 2022 and 2023 and $4.2 billion in 2025 $23.5 billion of financial assistance mobilized from the Ukraine Facility in 2024 $13.2 billion of financial assistance directly from EU Member States in grants, loans, and guarantees $3 billion in loans from the EIB and EBRD guaranteed by the EU budget $4.8 billion in humanitarian aid, emergency assistance, budget support and crisis response and $122 million to rebuild Ukrainian schools Over 154,000 tonnes of in-kind assistance, including medical supplies, mobile hospitals, shelters, school buses, ambulances, and close to 8,900 power generators, with an estimated value of over $1 billion, have been provided via the EU Civil Protection Mechanism by 35 participating countries, coordinated by the EU The EU has coordinated over 4,000 medical evacuations of Ukrainian patients to provide them with specialized healthcare in hospitals across Europe  Close to $53 billion in military assistance – ranging from ammunition to air-defense systems, Leopard tanks, and fighter jets. This includes an unprecedented $6.6 billion from the “European Peace Facility,” in addition to bilateral contributions from our Member States. On top of that, in March 2024, the Council established a dedicated Ukraine Assistance Fund worth $5.4 billion. EU support also includes $2.2 billion for the joint procurement and delivery of up to an additional one million rounds of artillery ammunition, and an additional $535 million to boost EU defense industry capacities in ammunition production. The EU is today the largest military training provider to the Ukrainian armed forces – over 73,000 Ukrainian military personnel were trained under the EU’s $390 million Military Assistance Mission. An additional $27 million have been provided for humanitarian de-mining of liberated territories.  Up to $18 billion from the EU budget to support Ukrainian refugees who have fled to EU Member States since February 2022. Close to 8 million refugees have been recorded in the EU, mainly women, children, and older persons, and more than 4 million Ukrainians have registered for temporary protection in the EU, which means they are entitled to work, accommodation, healthcare, as well as schooling for their children.  Over $2.2 billion to boost “EU Solidarity Lanes” to transport Ukrainian food to the world and address the food security crisis caused by Russia’s war. These lanes have already helped Ukraine export over 174 million tonnes of goods, including 83 million tonnes of grains and related products, and generated much-needed revenue for Ukraine’s economy.  We have temporarily suspended EU import duties for exports from Ukraine and figures show Ukraine’s exports are exceeding pre-war levels. By bringing war back to Europe, Putin plans not only to destroy Ukraine and destabilize Europe, but tear up international law and the UN Charter and undermine peace and security in the entire world, with dire consequences for vital American and European global security interests. We are grateful to the United States for its unwavering bipartisan support to Ukraine, and for standing with the European Union as we jointly work to ensure Ukraine’s victory in its ongoing fight for survival as an independent country and a sovereign nation. This is not the moment to weaken our support to Ukraine. Ukraine can only defeat Putin’s aggression if it stands firmly on two legs of American and European support. * EUR values converted into USD at the 12-month average ECB reference exchange rate as of 24 February. The total figure includes $23.5 billion already mobilized under the Ukraine Facility.
                It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                Comment

                • Frances_iom
                  Full Member
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 2434

                  Originally posted by vinteuil View Post

                  ... all of that is true. But if Russia 'wins' - viz claims all the Ukrainian territory it can - I do not think a subjugated Ukrainian population will passively submit. I can see an endless resistance movement, sabotaging what it can, to be termed a 'terrorist insurrection' by those of a Russian view. It's all going to be horrible, and I anticipate will go on for the rest of my life.
                  remember Stalin removed the Tatar population from Crimea - there's plenty of land in Siberia to accommodate unwanted Ukranians

                  Comment

                  • Retune
                    Full Member
                    • Feb 2022
                    • 341

                    Originally posted by eighthobstruction View Post
                    ....anyone been listening to/watching Jeffery Sachs views on cause (USA caused it, "it was started as a proxy war") But the war will be over soon and Russia will not invade Europe - Stop Russiaphobia , the expansion of EU led to a deadly expansion of NATO (NATO not needed), but EU should have it's own separate security structure and foreign policy (introduction about 10 minutes) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXGYZsA-cCA
                    Sachs seems to be the go-to apologist for dictators worldwide, with plenty of opinions useful to Putin, Xi and (until recently) Assad. He's basically just an elevated conspiracy theorist at this point. When the editor of The Lancet unwisely put Sachs in charge of their 'COVID-19 Commission', the whole thing descended into farce after he latched on to the wildest fringes of the 'lab leak hypothesis'. The virus, according to Sachs's biologically ludicrous pet theory, was engineered using a genetic sequence designed to mimic a segment of a human gene at the instigation of researchers in North Carolina, so the whole pandemic was really the fault of the US.

                    Comment

                    • eighthobstruction
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 6562

                      ....Yes you are right ....sorry I haven't time to engage)....Sach's certainly has a high opinion of himself. Putin did not need to target Hospitals/Civilans/ Schools, Shelter/the Old.
                      bong ching

                      Comment

                      • Dave2002
                        Full Member
                        • Dec 2010
                        • 18145

                        Originally posted by Retune View Post

                        Sachs seems to be the go-to apologist for dictators worldwide, with plenty of opinions useful to Putin, Xi and (until recently) Assad. He's basically just an elevated conspiracy theorist at this point. When the editor of The Lancet unwisely put Sachs in charge of their 'COVID-19 Commission', the whole thing descended into farce after he latched on to the wildest fringes of the 'lab leak hypothesis'. The virus, according to Sachs's biologically ludicrous pet theory, was engineered using a genetic sequence designed to mimic a segment of a human gene at the instigation of researchers in North Carolina, so the whole pandemic was really the fault of the US.
                        I don't know enough about Sachs to have a view - never seen anything about or by him before.

                        This might be salient though ""Europe should have its own foreign policy and its own military security, its own. I would disband NATO and may be Trump will do it anyway," said American economist and Columbia University Professor Jeffrey Sachs on February 19, 2025. "May be Trump will invade Greenland and then we will know what NATO is," he added. "Trump is an arms salesman. He is selling American technology. The increase in spending is for United States and not for you," he said."

                        Taken from the comment under the YT video linked to in msg 2079.

                        Comment

                        • Retune
                          Full Member
                          • Feb 2022
                          • 341

                          Originally posted by Dave2002 View Post
                          I don't know enough about Sachs to have a view - never seen anything about or by him before.

                          This might be salient though ""Europe should have its own foreign policy and its own military security, its own. I would disband NATO and may be Trump will do it anyway," said American economist and Columbia University Professor Jeffrey Sachs on February 19, 2025. "May be Trump will invade Greenland and then we will know what NATO is," he added. "Trump is an arms salesman. He is selling American technology. The increase in spending is for United States and not for you," he said."

                          Taken from the comment under the YT video linked to in msg 2079.
                          I wonder what Trump's policies will do to US arms exports in the long term? If the US is no longer seen as a reliable partner, it would be reasonable to expect that European countries (and others) will want to reduce their dependence on supplies of weapons and equipment that might be cut off at short notice at the whim of the current incumbent, or a like-minded successor. Perhaps Trump will be single-handedly responsible for the biggest boost in the European arms industry in 80 years, and US companies will eventually find themselves fighting for a reduced share of a tougher global market. But then I don't suppose Trump gives much thought to the long term consequences of anything.

                          Comment

                          • french frank
                            Administrator/Moderator
                            • Feb 2007
                            • 30908

                            Originally posted by Retune View Post
                            If the US is no longer seen as a reliable partner, it would be reasonable to expect that European countries (and others) will want to reduce their dependence on supplies of weapons and equipment that might be cut off at short notice at the whim of the current incumbent, or a like-minded successor.
                            A current topic of discussion among the Europeans, of course. The Economist has an article about how Trump's policies will backfire on the American economy.

                            Originally posted by Retune View Post
                            Perhaps Trump will be single-handedly responsible for the biggest boost in the European arms industry in 80 years
                            Not something in a vacuum to rejoice over, but circumstances alter cases - and, sadly, principles.
                            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                            Comment

                            • eighthobstruction
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 6562

                              ....I would say it will last exactly as long until the boards and share holders of Lockheed Martin/ Halliburton/ nortrop Grummam/ Heritage/ Boeing/ Sig Sauer/ Smith & Wesson find that their stocks have gone down...
                              bong ching

                              Comment

                              • Dave2002
                                Full Member
                                • Dec 2010
                                • 18145

                                Originally posted by french frank View Post
                                ... but circumstances alter cases - and, sadly, principles.
                                An interesting comment - which doesn't only apply to the immediate situations.

                                Bring on the Moral Maze and Trolley problems.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X