Originally posted by richardfinegold
View Post
Ukraine
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View Post"Putin knows that a Republican 'America First' victory is likely"
Not from what I read of the surveys of the USA's electorate as a whole.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
I think the BBC coverage, in the same way as many other reports, does not show a good understanding of what Ukraine is trying to do. In the face of determined and effective Russian resistance it is unrealistic to expect the sort of territorial advances we saw around Kharkiv last year. Instead Ukraine is grinding down the Russian forces, attacking them in several areas to increase the pressure. This will take time and results will be slow to appear.
Russia had has time to develop an impressive-looking system of fortifications, with very deep minefields. In the absence of air superiority Ukraine has little choice but to conduct a series of slow, cautious advances by infantry followed up by engineers. Meanwhile Ukrainian artillery and drones have been destroying Russia's artillery, as well as inflicting heavy casualties on Russian troops and armoured vehicles. The long-running campaign against Russian logistics, as well as command and communications, is also making Russia's defensive task more and more difficult.
I would disagree that Ukraine's forces are overstretched. On the contrary, significant numbers of well-equipped and trained forces have not yet been committed to the front line. I doubt that Russia has much in the way of meaningful reserves available to combat further Ukrainian successes. Russia's attempted advances in the north-eastern theatre have achieved only minor success. The Russian air force has only a limited effectiveness on the battlefield, as distinct from killing innocent civilians in war crimes. Their naval forces are under increasing threat in the Black Sea, a point made clear by the recent successful naval drone strike on a Russian warship near Novorossiysk, which involved a voyage of more than 750 km. Their armoured forces are decreasing in both quantity and quality. As mentioned above, Russian artillery superiority - which is crucial to the successful defence of their positions - is being systematically eroded.
Russia is still losing. I believe that Ukraine is still winning, albeit slowly.
Comment
-
-
my own theory is that Russia will slowly destroy enough infrastructure that Ukraine cannot rebuild - the dam was blown taking with it irrigation that will take years to rebuild + significant power loss, grain silos + ports are slowly being destroyed, the electricity supply network is significantly weakened, explosives known to be placed within the large nuclear site which will probably not cause a meltdown but destroy in one blast some 15% of the power generation which will take major expense to even safely demolish - Russia doesn't need to control it merely needs to destroy the state - the West has consistently misunderstood Putin - he doesn't need Ukraine's resources but cannot tolerate a western European state with such deep tentacles into Russian society.
Comment
-
-
In HD's absence, here is the latest from Prof. Sir Lawrence Freedman on the Global South, BRICS and the G20: the changing international system and the Ukraine War.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Historian View PostIn HD's absence, here is the latest from Prof. Sir Lawrence Freedman on the Global South, BRICS and the G20: the changing international system and the Ukraine War.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by antongould View PostIt isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by antongould View Post
indeed
Comment
-
-
That would be a coherent Russian strategy, however there attacks are actually much more limited in terms of destroying infrastructure. Apart from the apparently successful attacks on grain silos in the south west Russia still mainly targets residential areas. This is partly because many of their long-range weapons lack precision guidance systems.
Long-range bombing is difficult to counter. However, most of the Iranian drones are destroyed each time they are sent. The same is also true of some of the supersonic missiles which were supposedly invincible. Thanks to the West Ukraine now has very effective anti-air defences covering many major cities. These defences cannot cover everywhere.
Comment
-
-
Another factor could be cost. Long range missiles probably cost orders of magnitude more than some of the smaller artillery or drone attacks by either side. Thus the Russian approach is maybe "just" to cause terror - plus damage if it can - but it the stocks are dwinding as some suggest, and the relative costs of missiles vs everything else are much higher, then they are wasting their own resources.
Comment
-
Comment