Excellent article from Andrew Rawnsley in today's Guardian.
Dominic Cummings - a new kind of (anti-)hero..
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Petrushka View PostExcellent article from Andrew Rawnsley in today's Guardian.
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...-boris-johnson
True but let's not forget. A lot of the things Cummings is going on about, he was recruited to stop. The sooner that we put into statute that you cannot be an MP etc unless you've had x years actually doing something sensible/worthwhile/managing people/building something. Not a bloody career politician fresh out of university with zero awareness of how the world ticks.Fewer Smart things. More smart people.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Anastasius View PostTrue but let's not forget. A lot of the things Cummings is going on about, he was recruited to stop. The sooner that we put into statute that you cannot be an MP etc unless you've had x years actually doing something sensible/worthwhile/managing people/building something. Not a bloody career politician fresh out of university with zero awareness of how the world ticks.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Anastasius View PostTrue but let's not forget. A lot of the things Cummings is going on about, he was recruited to stop. The sooner that we put into statute that you cannot be an MP etc unless you've had x years actually doing something sensible/worthwhile/managing people/building something. Not a bloody career politician fresh out of university with zero awareness of how the world ticks.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by oddoneout View PostJudging by what happens with the appointment of senior managers and especially CEOs and the like I'm not sure that would help. Having a fixed idea how to "run things/manage people" from what has got them up the ladder isn't necessarily preferable to someone who lacks experience and that fixed view. The most important quality is the willingness and capability to learn, and quickly, to fill in the gaps. That may come from having a life in the "real world", but not automatically. Private school and a place in the family firm aren't the best grounding but would fill the experience tick box ?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by oddoneout View PostJudging by what happens with the appointment of senior managers and especially CEOs and the like I'm not sure that would help. Having a fixed idea how to "run things/manage people" from what has got them up the ladder isn't necessarily preferable to someone who lacks experience and that fixed view. The most important quality is the willingness and capability to learn, and quickly, to fill in the gaps. That may come from having a life in the "real world", but not automatically. Private school and a place in the family firm aren't the best grounding but would fill the experience tick box ?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by gradus View PostAren't psychopathic traits supposed to characterize many succesful leaders, certainly acutely heightened self-interest and ruthlessness towards others were characteristic of some effective leaders I've worked with and for in large companies.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by muzzer View PostIndeed, but Cummings isn’t a leader. That’s the point. He couldn’t run a bath.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
Comment