Dominic Cummings - a new kind of (anti-)hero..

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • french frank
    Administrator/Moderator
    • Feb 2007
    • 30455

    #46
    Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
    Another question worth asking is, what led Johnson to take Cummings on in the first place?
    Another 'exactly'. He knew what Cummings was. They were a group of Brexit fraudsters in it together and Cummings was employed for his success, in winning no matter how dishonest the means. As such, his hiring was a perfect reflection of Johnson's criteria - win by fair means or foul. Just win. But whoever thought Johnson's judgement was to be trusted?

    As ever, his tactic is to bluster when challenged: what "people want" is for the government to get the country going again (so stop asking your irrelevant questions).
    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

    Comment

    • Serial_Apologist
      Full Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 37813

      #47
      Originally posted by french frank View Post
      Another 'exactly'. He knew what Cummings was. They were a group of Brexit fraudsters in it together and Cummings was employed for his success, in winning no matter how dishonest the means. As such, his hiring was a perfect reflection of Johnson's criteria - win by fair means or foul. Just win. But whoever thought Johnson's judgement was to be trusted?

      As ever, his tactic is to bluster when challenged: what "people want" is for the government to get the country going again (so stop asking your irrelevant questions).


      But "trust of" and "support for" go together, like horse and carriage - because, as Old Blue Eyes told us, you can't have one without the other.

      Comment

      • Barbirollians
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 11751

        #48
        Originally posted by french frank View Post
        Another 'exactly'. He knew what Cummings was. They were a group of Brexit fraudsters in it together and Cummings was employed for his success, in winning no matter how dishonest the means. As such, his hiring was a perfect reflection of Johnson's criteria - win by fair means or foul. Just win. But whoever thought Johnson's judgement was to be trusted?

        As ever, his tactic is to bluster when challenged: what "people want" is for the government to get the country going again (so stop asking your irrelevant questions).
        Exactly

        Comment

        • oddoneout
          Full Member
          • Nov 2015
          • 9271

          #49
          Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
          Another question worth asking is, what led Johnson to take Cummings on in the first place? Hardly a positive reflection on the PM's judgement, all you people out there who fawn over his "charisma", even excluding every other judgement of his we are well aware of.
          I assume that Cummings made an effective sales pitch - told Johnson what he wanted to hear.

          Comment

          • gradus
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 5622

            #50
            I would be surprised if Mr Cummings has no more shots in his locker. As to truth-telling I think the closest we'll come is at the promised Inquiry.

            Comment

            • Petrushka
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 12308

              #51


              Expect Hancock to have gone in the next few days. I'd have thought that there could well be sufficient evidence for him to be facing possible jail time over this fiasco.
              "The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink

              Comment

              • vinteuil
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 12936

                #52
                Originally posted by Petrushka View Post
                https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...s-tested-covid

                Expect Hancock to have gone in the next few days..

                ... yes, more than likely that Johnson will throw him out as a sacrificial anode.

                And then we can expect Johnson to call up as his next Secretary of State for Health - Gavin Williamson? George Eustice? Robert Jenrick? Grant Shapps? Liz Truss? Lord Frost? Jacob Rees-Mogg?? - or why not Chris Grayling??

                Beyond despair

                .

                Comment

                • Richard Barrett
                  Guest
                  • Jan 2016
                  • 6259

                  #53
                  Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                  ... yes, more than likely that Johnson will throw him out as a sacrificial anode.
                  I don't know, the Tories turned out in force to support him this afternoon, and if Johnson sacks him that puts out the message that Cummings was right about him, in which case he could (as no doubt is actually the case) be right about Johnson as well.

                  Comment

                  • Bryn
                    Banned
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 24688

                    #54
                    Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
                    I don't know, the Tories turned out in force to support him this afternoon, and if Johnson sacks him that puts out the message that Cummings was right about him, in which case he could (as no doubt is actually the case) be right about Johnson as well.
                    There's also the question as to how quietly Hancock would go.

                    Comment

                    • vinteuil
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 12936

                      #55
                      Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                      There's also the question as to how quietly Hancock would go.
                      I feel he's already a broken man. I wouldn't be at all surprised if he was quite happy to depart the scene.

                      Trivial pursuit matter - Matt Hancock and Dominic Cummings went to the same Oxford college.

                      In fact the same college as Stanley (father of Boris) Johnson

                      ( ... and me )

                      .

                      Comment

                      • Nick Armstrong
                        Host
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 26572

                        #56
                        Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                        I feel he's already a broken man. I wouldn't be at all surprised if he was quite happy to depart the scene.

                        Trivial pursuit matter - Matt Hancock and Dominic Cummings went to the same Oxford college.

                        In fact the same college as Stanley (father of Boris) Johnson

                        ( ... and me )

                        .
                        "...the isle is full of noises,
                        Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
                        Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
                        Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

                        Comment

                        • ardcarp
                          Late member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 11102

                          #57
                          I haven't read all the posts but I have a slight unease about Cummings being allowed a platform to reveal what (he says) went on behind closed doors in No 10. He is not an elected official, so not part of our democratic system...as in fact none of the so-called special advisors are. I have absolutely no regard for Bojo or his ministers, nor for their truthfulness...but they were elected to office by the system we have. One would have thought that the Civil Service...also an officially accepted organ of our government system...would serve the function of providing advice to ministers and the PM, not crackpot individuals hired by personal whim. It seems that friction between 'special advisors' and civil servants was a major cause of the mayhem around dealing with our Covid crisis.

                          Comment

                          • cloughie
                            Full Member
                            • Dec 2011
                            • 22182

                            #58
                            K
                            Originally posted by ardcarp View Post
                            I haven't read all the posts but I have a slight unease about Cummings being allowed a platform to reveal what (he says) went on behind closed doors in No 10. He is not an elected official, so not part of our democratic system...as in fact none of the so-called special advisors are. I have absolutely no regard for Bojo or his ministers, nor for their truthfulness...but they were elected to office by the system we have. One would have thought that the Civil Service...also an officially accepted organ of our government system...would serve the function of providing advice to ministers and the PM, not crackpot individuals hired by personal whim. It seems that friction between 'special advisors' and civil servants was a major cause of the mayhem around dealing with our Covid crisis.
                            I agree with what you say but maybe Boris and his sycophants are reaping what they have sown. Bungling has its price!

                            Comment

                            • ardcarp
                              Late member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 11102

                              #59
                              I agree 100%. BJ was indeed stupid to hire Cummings in the first place. But it's the latter's apparent 'right' to have a public voice that worries me.

                              Comment

                              • muzzer
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2013
                                • 1193

                                #60
                                They’re all charlatans aren’t they? I can’t imagine what will come out about vaccine procurement when the dust settles. But the point is Johnson has an immense majority and the combo of brexit and Covid is delivering a Tory hegemony they could only have dreamed of a decade ago. I’d be surprised if Hancock goes. There’s an age-old phrase for why but in the context of covid it would be in v poor taste to use it.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X