Originally posted by Pulcinella
View Post
Some countries appear not to charge their own students for higher education. There can be reciprocal arrangements between different countries based on this assumption - for example between Sweden and Germany.
There is tension, though perhaps at a low level, between some countries re higher education. I suspect that medical students from Norway taking courses in Sweden are seen as a problem by some. The Swedish education is good, but who bears the cost? Norway is now thought to be a more prosperous country than Sweden - which was not always the case. I don't know whether there is any balancing transfer of funds from Norway to Sweden to "pay" for the relatively expensive education which Norwegian students receive if they study in Sweden.
Where there are charges for higher education, as in parts of the UK (England), I believe that the charges were levied for EU students at the same level as "Home" students. Maybe under Erasmus these fees were then paid for out of the scheme. Where the UK may differ from other countries is that it uses differential pricing. Students who are not classed as Home students get charged considerably more, and this would include students from countries such as India, China and many African countries.
I don't know whether there is now to be a new relationship for EU students - and indeed "who" decides. Is it going to be determined by HMG, or by each institution? Institutions can, to some extent, offset fees - with scholarships and bursaries, but I don't know how much discretion each institution has and how much of the financing is decided by central government.
Language students will of course benefit from studying abroad, but my undertanding of Erasmus is that it wasn't restricted to students of language. There are many reasons why such interchanges could be beneficial, both to countries and also to the students, though there are also some unwelcome problems, perhaps not directly related to education.
Comment