This subject is bound to be broached sooner or later, so I thought I'd try & get discussion off the ground.
Without wishing excessively to front-load the debate with one of my customary long essays, the present blockage that is leading to much pessimism as to the likelihood of a deal being reached seems less attributable to "principle" - from the EU point of view the supposed "integrity of the market, from that of GB "national self-rule" - than a mutual intransigence born of inflexibility, particularly on the part of the Tory government and its nationalistic grass roots. Johnson and co could choose to interpret "our" right to decide on trade and other terms by compromising and granting most of what the French fishing industry is demanding by way of access to "our waters". This has always seemed to me to be the clinching issue - years ago I predicted military conflict with France resulting on French fisher folk blocking access to our boats and their ports, given the heavy emotional weight invested in the matter by the French electorate, to which Macron (or whichever President) would be forced to respond. On that other main issue, namely the right of British governments to subsidise our domestic industries, this amounts to hypocritical rhetoric where the Tories are concerned, as they have always been given to condemning EU subsidies as wasteful and anti-competitive, while of course accepting EU handouts to our most economically neglected regions. As far as I understand, the other main issue, the Ulster/Irish Republic border, has now been settled?
I believe, in short, that a small, symbolical gesture in proportional terms would shift the logjam to a negotiated settlement.
Without wishing excessively to front-load the debate with one of my customary long essays, the present blockage that is leading to much pessimism as to the likelihood of a deal being reached seems less attributable to "principle" - from the EU point of view the supposed "integrity of the market, from that of GB "national self-rule" - than a mutual intransigence born of inflexibility, particularly on the part of the Tory government and its nationalistic grass roots. Johnson and co could choose to interpret "our" right to decide on trade and other terms by compromising and granting most of what the French fishing industry is demanding by way of access to "our waters". This has always seemed to me to be the clinching issue - years ago I predicted military conflict with France resulting on French fisher folk blocking access to our boats and their ports, given the heavy emotional weight invested in the matter by the French electorate, to which Macron (or whichever President) would be forced to respond. On that other main issue, namely the right of British governments to subsidise our domestic industries, this amounts to hypocritical rhetoric where the Tories are concerned, as they have always been given to condemning EU subsidies as wasteful and anti-competitive, while of course accepting EU handouts to our most economically neglected regions. As far as I understand, the other main issue, the Ulster/Irish Republic border, has now been settled?
I believe, in short, that a small, symbolical gesture in proportional terms would shift the logjam to a negotiated settlement.
Comment