Originally posted by ardcarp
View Post
Coronavirus
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by LMcD View PostGood question. The New Zealand PM demoted her Health Minister and took away his secondary post, while making it clear that, but for the coronavirus emergency, he would have been sacked. The Scottish Medical Director resigned when it became impossible for her to remain in post. I suspect 'Jenrick's Jaunt' may encourage other 'trips taking medicines to parents' - a claim which might prove difficult to disprove.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostWith the influence he could exert with medical practitioners and pharmacists I find it hard to believe he needed to travel to Herefordshire AND Shropshire when his family mansion is in London and his constituency is Newark, Notts where apparently his constituents rarely see him!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LMcD View PostAny more talk like that, sonny, and we shall have to seriously consider sending a couple of lads round to have a chat with you. You might like to have a small suitcase ready packed .
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostShould Jenrick resign as a prominent ‘do as I say not as I do’ practitioner?
Also, some times things go wrong - as with the broken down delivery van the other day, which meant we had to go out to pick up the food. There are bound to be some failures which will need work arounds.
I have still not managed to get a sensible way of getting my prescription medicine. Allegedly the vast army of volunteer helpers are frustrated at not having too much to do. Also, many people who can't go out could easily be asked to co-ordinate logistics and strategies, without them needing to go out personally. I'd willingly do that for a few hours a day, if anyone wanted me to do that, but nobody seems to have thought that might be a good thing for those who are now in enforced "idleness". There are too many glitches in our "systems", which could be smoothed out or worked round, if people put their minds to them.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Dave2002 View PostI don't know. I think helping out elderly parents is not unreasonable - for example by doing food drops, or medicine drops, but I hear rumours that he may have gone a long way, and thus set a blatantly bad example. Total clamp down on people who may be trying to do the right thing seems stupid, but some people are just pushing things too far. However, in the absence of some sensible services and joined up thinking, there are times when one might imagine that people taking things into their own hands makes sense. I would probably do that if I really thought it was the only way.
Also, some times things go wrong - as with the broken down delivery van the other day, which meant we had to go out to pick up the food. There are bound to be some failures which will need work arounds.
I have still not managed to get a sensible way of getting my prescription medicine. Allegedly the vast army of volunteer helpers are frustrated at not having too much to do. Also, many people who can't go out could easily be asked to co-ordinate logistics and strategies, without them needing to go out personally. I'd willingly do that for a few hours a day, if anyone wanted me to do that, but nobody seems to have thought that might be a good thing for those who are now in enforced "idleness". There are too many glitches in our "systems", which could be smoothed out or worked round, if people put their minds to them.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostSorry but I do not buy it - which of his three homes is is his primary residence and is he not risking carrying the virus?
I guess this is one source - https://www.theguardian.com/politics...uring-lockdownLast edited by Dave2002; 11-04-20, 15:34.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostSorry but I do not buy it - which of his three homes is is his primary residence and is he not risking carrying the virus?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostUnder "normal" circumstances I would argue that imposing restrictions on personal freedoms encourages the worst in petty-mindedness and interfering curtain-twitching, but here I have to agree - unfortunately in this situation one does have to apply the "thin end of a wedge" position. How many freedoms we take for granted will we get back once this is all over is another question...
as for the MP/PM who ignored all advice, got himself infected, probably went around infecting others ..... if he was a single parent in a poor neighbourhood ... and so on and so on
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LMcD View PostAny more talk like that, sonny, and we shall have to seriously consider sending a couple of lads round to have a chat with you. You might like to have a small suitcase ready packed .I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostOne notes the home sec saying not "we're sorry for the inadequate supply of PPE to NHS workers, but "sorry if people feel there have been failings..." etc...
On and on they go.....
Further comment unnecessary, well printable comment at least.......
Comment
-
-
This article suggests how to gain control, then lose it again - https://www.wired.co.uk/article/asia...=pocket-newtab
Holidays abroad might have to be off the menu even if the local lockdown is lifted.
Comment
-
Comment