Coronavirus

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • johnb
    Full Member
    • Mar 2007
    • 2903

    There is an article on the Guardian website saying that the reason that the hospitalisations and deaths have continued to decline while the reported CV-19 has stabilised is due to the effect of the vaccine.



    I have no argument with that but there is another factor which the article ignores.

    If you look at the cases by age group for England you find that the cases have continued to decline in people aged 20 and over but have shown a significant upward trend in the 0-19 age group.

    The increase in the 0-19 age group is obviously linked to schools reopening and to the massive number of lateral flow tests carried out on schools. (In the w/e 17th March 74% of all lateral flow tests were carried out at secondary schools and colleges.)

    The latest data shows.

    Code:
    Age	7 days to 23 Mar 
    Group	vs 7 days to 16 Mar
    
    0-19	+25%
    20-39	 -9%
    40-59	-10%
    60+	-24%
    Charts:


    Comment

    • Frances_iom
      Full Member
      • Mar 2007
      • 2416

      are these just positive tests (real or false) or are they actual cases as confirmed by a full test?
      If the latter then given the infectivity of the Kent variety I would expect to see significant infection in parents and siblings following on.

      Comment

      • johnb
        Full Member
        • Mar 2007
        • 2903

        Originally posted by Frances_iom View Post
        are these just positive tests (real or false) or are they actual cases as confirmed by a full test?
        If the latter then given the infectivity of the Kent variety I would expect to see significant infection in parents and siblings following on.
        Good question, they are the positive tests (real or false) reported on the government dashboard, so they will be a mix of PCR only, Lateral Flow only and Lateral Flow confirmed by PCR (in the latter case only first test in counted in the figures, if my memory serves me correctly).

        Comment

        • Bryn
          Banned
          • Mar 2007
          • 24688

          Horrific news regarding the latest variant in Brazil. Mortality rates escalating quasi-exponentially, and it's hitting the young, too.

          Comment

          • Frances_iom
            Full Member
            • Mar 2007
            • 2416

            Originally posted by Bryn View Post
            Horrific news regarding the latest variant in Brazil. Mortality rates escalating quasi-exponentially, and it's hitting the young, too.
            reference? the Spanish flu of 1918-1920 hit young fit adults by over-provoking the body's immune response

            Comment

            • Bryn
              Banned
              • Mar 2007
              • 24688

              Originally posted by Frances_iom View Post
              reference? the Spanish flu of 1918-1920 hit young fit adults by over-provoking the body's immune response
              Channel 4 News report from Brazil this evening. As to over-provoking the immune response, that is also a characteristic of SARS-CoV-2 which was recognised as early as a year ago, which was why immunosuppressants became part of the treatment regime for severe cases of COVID-19.

              Comment

              • teamsaint
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 25226

                Here’s a little puzzle.

                The link has lots of graphs, including one for first vaccinations by for over 50s age group, by region. In every geographical area there is a blip, in that rates drop a bit in each age group except the 60-64 group, where they are higher than the 65 -69 group.

                GPs across the UK have led the largest-ever NHS vaccination programme in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Find out how the campaign is progressing and keep track of COVID-19 prevalence with the GPonline tracker.


                Seems odd.
                I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

                I am not a number, I am a free man.

                Comment

                • subcontrabass
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 2780

                  Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
                  Here’s a little puzzle.

                  The link has lots of graphs, including one for first vaccinations by for over 50s age group, by region. In every geographical area there is a blip, in that rates drop a bit in each age group except the 60-64 group, where they are higher than the 65 -69 group.

                  GPs across the UK have led the largest-ever NHS vaccination programme in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Find out how the campaign is progressing and keep track of COVID-19 prevalence with the GPonline tracker.


                  Seems odd.
                  One problem is that the ONS estimates of the population in each age group seeem to be unreliable (and they are out of date, being for mid-2019). For example, the number vaccinated in the 75-59 age group is greater than the total estimated population, so the population estimate there is clearly wrong. .

                  Comment

                  • oddoneout
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2015
                    • 9279

                    Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
                    Here’s a little puzzle.

                    The link has lots of graphs, including one for first vaccinations by for over 50s age group, by region. In every geographical area there is a blip, in that rates drop a bit in each age group except the 60-64 group, where they are higher than the 65 -69 group.

                    GPs across the UK have led the largest-ever NHS vaccination programme in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Find out how the campaign is progressing and keep track of COVID-19 prevalence with the GPonline tracker.


                    Seems odd.
                    Something that happened in my immediate area that I am aware of was that quite a lot of the 65-69 group(including me) ended up waiting for local jabs(due to problems accessing regional hubs) which for various reasons were slow coming, but when the next group was given the go-ahead they took advantage of the regional hubs and so (legitimately) leapfrogged ahead in numbers.

                    Comment

                    • teamsaint
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 25226

                      Originally posted by oddoneout View Post
                      Something that happened in my immediate area that I am aware of was that quite a lot of the 65-69 group(including me) ended up waiting for local jabs(due to problems accessing regional hubs) which for various reasons were slow coming, but when the next group was given the go-ahead they took advantage of the regional hubs and so (legitimately) leapfrogged ahead in numbers.
                      I did wonder if transport issue might be a big part of it.
                      Not much problem getting an appointment round here for anybody over 50 , it has to be said.
                      I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

                      I am not a number, I am a free man.

                      Comment

                      • cloughie
                        Full Member
                        • Dec 2011
                        • 22183

                        A question for Micky D
                        We hear of the current high Covid rate in France - what is the Arlesienne situation?

                        Comment

                        • Pianorak
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 3128

                          Reading this article makes me wonder what the implications are. What does the medical profession make of it?

                          Background The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to the development of various vaccines. Real-life data on immune responses elicited in the most vulnerable group of vaccinees over 80 years old is still underrepresented despite the prioritization of the elderly in vaccination campaigns. Methods We conducted a cohort study with two age groups, young vaccinees below the age of 60 and elderly vaccinees over the age of 80, to compare their antibody responses to the first and second dose of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination. Results While the majority of participants in both groups produced specific IgG antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, titers were significantly lower in elderly participants. Although the increment of antibody levels after the second immunization was higher in elderly participants, the absolute mean titer of this group remained lower than the <60 group. After the second vaccination, 31.3 % of the elderly had no detectable neutralizing antibodies in contrast to the younger group, in which only 2.2% had no detectable neutralizing antibodies. Conclusion Our data suggests that lower frequencies of neutralizing antibodies after BNT162b2 vaccination in the elderly population may require earlier revaccination to ensure strong immunity and protection against infection. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Funding Statement This work was supported by Stiftung für Altersforschung, Düsseldorf for [to H.S., L.W.], Jürgen Manchot foundation [to H.S., I.D. L.M., L.W., A.R., J.T., R.G., P.N.O.]. This work was supported by research funding from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) grant GK1949/1 and project number 452147069 [to I.D.]. This work was supported by the Forschungskommission of the Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf [to H.S., J.P., J.H.] ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: The ethics committee of the Medical Faculty at the Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany (study no. 2021-1287), approved the study. All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable. Yes There is no supplemental data available.


                          Results - While the majority of participants in both groups produced specific IgG antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, titers were significantly lower in elderly participants. Although the increment of antibody levels after the second immunization was higher in elderly participants, the absolute mean titer of this group remained lower than the <60 group. After the second vaccination, 31.3 % of the elderly had no detectable neutralizing antibodies in contrast to the younger group, in which only 2.2% had no detectable neutralizing antibodies.
                          Conclusion - Our data suggests that lower frequencies of neutralizing antibodies after BNT162b2 vaccination in the elderly population may require earlier revaccination to ensure strong immunity and protection against infection.
                          My life, each morning when I dress, is four and twenty hours less. (J Richardson)

                          Comment

                          • teamsaint
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 25226

                            Here’s another curiosity.

                            Penultimate paragraph in this Nature article suggests that Covid “ is probably not less transmissible than flu.”



                            Which is not at all in line with what we have been told.
                            Last edited by teamsaint; 08-04-21, 21:53.
                            I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

                            I am not a number, I am a free man.

                            Comment

                            • johnb
                              Full Member
                              • Mar 2007
                              • 2903

                              Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
                              Here’s another curiosity.

                              Penultimate paragraph in this Nature article suggests that Covid “ is probably not less transmissible than flu.”



                              Which is not at all in line with what we have been told.
                              An interesting article, though the author, Christie Aschwanden, is credited as being a science journalist rather than a scientist.

                              In the penultimate para he quotes a certain Samuel Scarpino as saying

                              “Influenza is probably not less transmissible than COVID-19,” Scarpino says. “Almost certainly, the reason why flu did not show up this year is because we typically have about 30% of the population immune because they’ve been infected in previous years, and you get vaccination covering maybe another 30%. So you’re probably sitting at 60% or so immune.” Add mask wearing and social distancing, and “the flu just can’t make it”
                              The reasons I highlighted in bold are not unique to this year - they apply to every flue season. What is unique to this flue season has been the lockdown and IMO this the main reason why influenza has been largely absent this year.

                              All the reports and papers that I have looked at have come to the conclusion that SARS-Cov-2 has a higher R0 than seasonal influenza.

                              Comment

                              • cloughie
                                Full Member
                                • Dec 2011
                                • 22183

                                Originally posted by johnb View Post
                                An interesting article, though the author, Christie Aschwanden, is credited as being a science journalist rather than a scientist.

                                In the penultimate para he quotes a certain Samuel Scarpino as saying



                                The reasons I highlighted in bold are not unique to this year - they apply to every flue season. What is unique to this flue season has been the lockdown and IMO this the main reason that influenza has been largely absent this year.

                                All the reports and papers that I have looked at have come to the conclusion that SARS-Cov-2 has a higher R0 than seasonal influenza.
                                I suspect also there was less flu because people didn’t go out and catch or spread it.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X