Originally posted by David-G
View Post
Censorship....
Collapse
X
-
Call me suspicious, but two nights in a row my satellite signal for BBC has cut out around 10.30 PM , and stayed out for most of the next 45 mins.
All the other major channels were unaffected.
Just saying.........I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by teamsaint View PostCall me suspicious, but two nights in a row my satellite signal for BBC has cut out around 10.30 PM , and stayed out for most of the next 45 mins.
All the other major channels were unaffected.
Just saying.........
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LMcD View PostYou should be grateful - it means you can't watch the dreadful 'Yoof Stream' that now occupies BBC1 after the (sadly shortened) news![FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LMcD View PostYou should be grateful - it means you can't watch the dreadful 'Yoof Stream' that now occupies BBC1 after the (sadly shortened) news!
Probably for the best, all in all.
Horlicks is the very minimum prescription for watching Newsnight these days, I'd say.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by teamsaint View PostSorry, rather misled you there, it was BBC2 only that conked out.
Probably for the best, all in all.
Horlicks is the very minimum prescription for watching Newsnight these days, I'd say.
Well, that's quite clearly a thinly-veiled warning to those over 75s (including Mr & Mrs McD!) who might be thinking of not paying for their TV licence once more as from next June.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by teamsaint View PostSorry, rather misled you there, it was BBC2 only that conked out.
Probably for the best, all in all.
Horlicks is the very minimum prescription for watching Newsnight these days, I'd say.
Comment
-
-
I'm sad that apparently discussions re "current affairs". have led some to leave the forum, but if that's the price to pay for not losing sanity in the whole country, then so be it.
People have the right to be ostriches if they want to, but they don't have to cover the heads of others with sand.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Dave2002 View PostI'm sad that apparently discussions re "current affairs". have led some to leave the forum, but if that's the price to pay for not losing sanity in the whole country, then so be it.
People have the right to be ostriches if they want to, but they don't have to cover the heads of others with sand.
There is also the ‘Ignore’ button, which I have found invaluable in the past.
Really: it’s quite insulting to the moderators (for whom I have a lot of time, despite my ongoing disagreements with them) to abandon the forum because people are talking about ‘politics’. It’s not like engagement in these discussions is in any way mandatory, is it?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Conchis View PostI don’t understand the thinking of the frail, ladylike souls who have taken flight. Political content tends to be confined to political threads - which they can ignore if they so choose.
There is also the ‘Ignore’ button, which I have found invaluable in the past.
Really: it’s quite insulting to the moderators (for whom I have a lot of time, despite my ongoing disagreements with them) to abandon the forum because people are talking about ‘politics’. It’s not like engagement in these discussions is in any way mandatory, is it?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostIt's impossible to avoid politics - so any outlet for discussing them seems part of the realities we talk about on this forum. Disagreements aren't just about political matters here, and this is supposed to be a society built on freedom of expression.
Much Madness is divinest Sense -
To a discerning Eye -
Much Sense - the starkest Madness -
'Tis the Majority
In this, as all, prevail -
Assent - and you are sane -
Demur - you're straightway dangerous -
And handled with a Chain -
Emily Dickinson
Comment
-
Comment