If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I think your assessment of Jeremy Corbyn's position is probably very accurate.
I'm not sure if he's the leader for a 'broad church', where dissent is inevitable - people who are active at a high level within the Labour party are best placed to assess him and the concern he shows for dissent. They themselves may carry their own individual baggage which is largely unknowable (e.g. 'They always were Tories, anyway'). We, outside the party, mainly judge by what we read - and our own baggage tends to determine where we read about them.
Last edited by french frank; 24-02-19, 12:12.
Reason: Determinate
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
I'm not sure if he's the leader for a 'broad church', where dissent is inevitable - people who are active at a high level within the Labour party are best placed to assess him and the concern he shows for dissent. They themselves may carry their own individual baggage which is largely unknowable (e.g. 'They always were Tories, anyway'). We, outside the party, mainly judge by what we read - and our own baggage tends to determine where we read about them.
What strikes me as more than a little odd is that I know several (many even?) folks who are ethusiastic supporters of Corbyn (apart from his stance on the EU, where it is abundantly clear that he is against the UK being a member)
BUT, when it comes to his views on the EU are quite happy to "let him off" EVEN when they know that it's a disaster.
What strikes me as more than a little odd is that I know several (many even?) folks who are ethusiastic supporters of Corbyn (apart from his stance on the EU, where it is abundantly clear that he is against the UK being a member)
BUT, when it comes to his views on the EU are quite happy to "let him off" EVEN when they know that it's a disaster.
Political views are becoming so fragmented that whenever any of us voices our opinion, we are increasingly part of a sub-group of a sub-group of a sub-group. It used to be easier to join together, cooperate and follow the consensus.
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Political views are becoming so fragmented that whenever any of us voices our opinion, we are increasingly part of a sub-group of a sub-group of a sub-group. It used to be easier to join together, cooperate and follow the consensus.
Yes, but i'm still puzzled by those who seem to be prepared to ignore things in this way.
Often the same folks will say "apart from the Labour party position on the EU" and so on
Yes, but i'm still puzzled by those who seem to be prepared to ignore things in this way.
Often the same folks will say "apart from the Labour party position on the EU" and so on
I presume because everyone has their 'non-negotiables' and we all have different ones. For many people, left and right, the EU is not one of them.
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Yes, but i'm still puzzled by those who seem to be prepared to ignore things in this way.
Often the same folks will say "apart from the Labour party position on the EU" and so on
Many people (including me) don't regard Brexit as the only meaningful political issue in the UK today. That doesn't mean they're "ignoring" anything.
Also, it isn't over yet. I'm sure we are in for quite a few more twists and turns and surprises between now and the end of March, and it won't be over then either.
I haven't had much time for Tom Watson in the past, but he's proving a calm voice in a storm - and a sharper cookie than I'd expected:
On Emily Thornberry's 'rather die than join a new party':
Watson: Dying is a virtue that is over-rated.
Andrew Marr (pressing him on JC's leadership): If I were leader of the Labour party I would blah blah blah …
Watson: That's why you're not leader of the Labour party.
But too centrist for half the Labour party, no doubt.
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Even if the current government succeeds in taking the UK out of the EU, it seems highly likely that another will negotiate re-entry in a few years' time, though on terms less advantageous than those currently in place.
Even if the current government succeeds in taking the UK out of the EU, it seems highly likely that another will negotiate re-entry in a few years' time, though on terms less advantageous than those currently in place.
I've just posted what I think Is an excellent article by Caroline Lucas which might make some on the left contemplate what life outside the EU might just be like. ISDS, anyone? Bowing to the demands of multi-nationals? If you're not in power, there's nothing you can do about it:
Deals containing clauses that threaten human rights are being debated in parliament – they must be defeated, says the Green party’s Caroline Lucas
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
No doubt! That calls into question what the role of a party leader should be. Is it simply to force/persuade the party to follow the leader's own vision? Watson does recognise a breakdown in teamwork, and, presumably, the importance of teamwork.
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
What strikes me as more than a little odd is that I know several (many even?) folks who are ethusiastic supporters of Corbyn (apart from his stance on the EU, where it is abundantly clear that he is against the UK being a member) BUT, when it comes to his views on the EU are quite happy to "let him off" EVEN when they know that it's a disaster.
I've noticed this, too. You don't have to be a Liberal Democrat to point out the essential fallacy of his position.
The same people give the same 'pass' to Dennis Skinner, even though he's neither use nor ornament to anyone apart from himself and actively enjoys being in opposition rather than in government.
Comment