Originally posted by Dave2002
View Post
Location, Location, Location - What We Are Not Told About Buying a House
Collapse
X
-
I think you are expecting too much from a programme whose main(possibly sole) purpose, is to entertain. It isn't a consumer guide to relocating/finding your 'forever' home(always worry that's the kiss of death when broadcast to several million viewers).Questions about building on or otherwise losing a view do arise, and as to facilities schools in particular are frequently mentioned.
If the couple had sold property(ies) they owned previously then they could well have made money enough, plus current salaries, to afford that kind of budget. My son and DIL, same age, had a similar budget for their home bought last year, made possible in large part by selling their flat in central London for silly money and moving further out.
I lived for 24 years opposite a cemetery; my in laws hated its situation,but we liked it. It was active and well maintained and we had a borrowed landscape of trees, grass and decorative buildings, to say nothing of a much lower rateable value than would otherwise have been the case which saved us quite a bit over the years. The church was in town and not adjacent to the cemetery but proximity doesn't always have much bearing on chancel tax - the property was in theory liable.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Lat-Literal View PostThere have been English people looking at properties worth over a million who say "haitch".
That, to me, is upsetting.
I still get upset if people say "different to", rather than "different from" and various other forms of speech, but that doesn't mean
those people deserve my opprobrium.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Dave2002 View PostDoes that say as much about you as about them?
I still get upset if people say "different to", rather than "different from" and various other forms of speech, but that doesn't mean
those people deserve my opprobrium.
More some sort of sense of a preferred natural order linked to concepts of meritocracy.
Originally posted by oddoneout View PostI think you are expecting too much from a programme whose main(possibly sole) purpose, is to entertain. It isn't a consumer guide to relocating/finding your 'forever' home(always worry that's the kiss of death when broadcast to several million viewers).Questions about building on or otherwise losing a view do arise, and as to facilities schools in particular are frequently mentioned.
If the couple had sold property(ies) they owned previously then they could well have made money enough, plus current salaries, to afford that kind of budget. My son and DIL, same age, had a similar budget for their home bought last year, made possible in large part by selling their flat in central London for silly money and moving further out.
I lived for 24 years opposite a cemetery; my in laws hated its situation,but we liked it. It was active and well maintained and we had a borrowed landscape of trees, grass and decorative buildings, to say nothing of a much lower rateable value than would otherwise have been the case which saved us quite a bit over the years. The church was in town and not adjacent to the cemetery but proximity doesn't always have much bearing on chancel tax - the property was in theory liable.Last edited by Lat-Literal; 09-01-18, 13:05.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by eighthobstruction View Post
....Myself, I couldn't be so contumely....Originally posted by Dave2002 View PostAh - the learning experience. I'll add it to my terms for invective.
.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Lat-Literal View PostI don't think it is opprobrium.
More some sort of sense of a preferred natural order linked to concepts of meritocracy.
Perhaps - I'm actually for Kirstie Allsopp. I like her as a broadcaster and what I know of her as a person. Less so, other presenters, eg on Coast vs Country. But I would like more explanations along the lines that you have provided. Even then, had your son and DIL been boarding school teachers in their 20s in Central London, I doubt that that they would have been in the same financial situation. It seems to me generally that there is too much emphasis in the programmes on properties that are not affordable to most people and that they are to some extent fuelling discontent. It's dream based. They don't point out many of the negatives. I write as someone who is lucky enough to own three quarters of a tiny bungalow.
Personally I often wonder if the programme is completely staged. I doubt the prospective purchasers are genuinely looking at properties in the price range shown. I sometimes wonder if the prospective purchasers are genuinely looking to move at all.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Stanfordian View PostHiya Lat-Literal,
Personally I often wonder if the programme is completely staged. I doubt the prospective purchasers are genuinely looking at properties in the price range shown. I sometimes wonder if the prospective purchasers are genuinely looking to move at all.bong ching
Comment
-
Comment