Is recycling worthwhile?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dave2002
    Full Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 18009

    #46
    A bump on this one. Ben Webster (The Times) is just about hinting that much of recycling is really a waste of time - or at least the way that it's currently being done.

    The heap of post-Christmas rubbish is 15ft high, weighs several tonnes and is growing longer by the minute in the cavernous hall of a “materials recycling faci

    Comment

    • MrGongGong
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 18357

      #47
      I think the underlying problem of lots of this is that people are too attached to the idea of "freedom of choice" in what they consume
      If ALL wine, beer, milk etc was in a small set of standard bottles then these could be re-used
      BUT the "freedom" of "the market" to make small variations in order to try and distinguish one product from another means this won't happen

      We should be re-using things before we even think about recycling

      Comment

      • DracoM
        Host
        • Mar 2007
        • 12963

        #48

        Comment

        • french frank
          Administrator/Moderator
          • Feb 2007
          • 30255

          #49
          Originally posted by Dave2002 View Post
          A bump on this one. Ben Webster (The Times) is just about hinting that much of recycling is really a waste of time - or at least the way that it's currently being done.

          https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/n...aste-n6x5lkjw7
          Can only read the top bit of the story, but if it's suggesting that 20% of what people 'recycle' gets incinerated, I'm not sure that that's enough to claim that 'much of it is a waste of time'. Does it clarify that what people have put into their recycling boxes has been correctly placed there, or should that 20% have been put in the wheelie bin in the first place? BCC certainly claims that 'Everything that goes into your recycling boxes is put to good use, and all of Bristol’s recycling is sent to reprocessors within England and Wales'. (Maybe the incinerated remains are used for something … ?)

          And what happens to the incinerated remains?

          But the priorities are: Reduce, reuse, recycle.
          It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

          Comment

          • jean
            Late member
            • Nov 2010
            • 7100

            #50
            Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
            I think the underlying problem of lots of this is that people are too attached to the idea of "freedom of choice" in what they consume
            If ALL wine, beer, milk etc was in a small set of standard bottles then these could be re-used
            It's the manufacturers who insist on different sizes and shapes of container. The consumers have never been asked.

            It's also the manufacturers who have so far resisted requests to resume charging refundable deposits on containers.

            Comment

            • MrGongGong
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 18357

              #51
              Originally posted by jean View Post
              It's the manufacturers who insist on different sizes and shapes of container. The consumers have never been asked.

              It's also the manufacturers who have so far resisted requests to resume charging refundable deposits on containers.
              Indeed
              But I would bet that people like the idea of "choice"
              it always sounds so "right"

              The only way to change this is to make it illegal to sell stuff in containers that can't be re-used

              Comment

              • Zucchini
                Guest
                • Nov 2010
                • 917

                #52
                Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                The only way to change this is to make it illegal to sell stuff in containers that can't be re-used
                But how much does it cost to make every container 100% safe for reuse - maybe one in a million had methylated spirits in it, maybe one in a fifty million is contaminated with HIV virus and so on.

                Do you just say nearly all will be OK, so send them back to the manufacturer, make them built storage and standard sterilisation facilities. And tell them to fill 'em up and send 'em off to Tesco ...

                Comment

                • oddoneout
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2015
                  • 9152

                  #53
                  The whole recycling issue is a minefield of piecemeal policy and vested interests. Individual councils within a county will have differing rules about what to put in the recycling bins, what can be recycled, and what kind of containers are used for the waste(boxes or wheelie bins). Constantly changing contracts mean that what you can take to the waste facility change as well - is there a textile bank today or is it only clean clothes for charity, has the hard plastic skip for plant pots etc gone now? It is especially irritating when, as in my area, several councils are using the same central processing site but have different rules because they have different contractors collecting the waste.
                  Two things which aren't going to help matters - China is not going to be taking so much of our plastic waste, and those authorities which have contracts to send waste to Europe for incineration may find that is no longer an option.
                  FF, re incineration. These days that is generally to power either heating or electricity generating plants. When my son lived in Bermondsey the block of flats had a district heating system partly powered by a nearby incinerator.Metals can be recovered from the ash.
                  A bugbear of mine, beyond the stupid and counter-productive lack of consistency, is that recycling does not alter the 'throw-away' mind set. People won't consider reducing or rejecting waste so long as there is a bin to put it in. In fact there are many who feel virtuous about chucking things away if they have checked it's recyclable and put it in the right receptacle. The thought that the container or wrapper wasn't needed in the first place is dismissed.

                  Comment

                  • oddoneout
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2015
                    • 9152

                    #54
                    Originally posted by Zucchini View Post
                    But how much does it cost to make every container 100% safe for reuse - maybe one in a million had methylated spirits in it, maybe one in a fifty million is contaminated with HIV virus and so on.

                    Do you just say nearly all will be OK, so send them back to the manufacturer, make them built storage and standard sterilisation facilities. And tell them to fill 'em up and send 'em off to Tesco ...
                    They manage it in Holland....From Wiki
                    "Deposit systems are in use for beer bottles, larger plastic bottles, and plastic crates for bottles. For these items, the deposit (or statiegeld) is returned by automated machines at supermarkets. A video of such a machine in use and returning the deposit is available on YouTube.[7]"
                    I remember doing this when I visited my sister at least 17 years ago - coke and lemonade bottles and glass jars put in a carousel outside the supermarket which scanned them(and rejected unsuitable items) and then issued a ticket to present at the checkout when shopping. Sorting is the key.
                    The telling phrase from the Wiki item is the reference to lack of ground for waste disposal, and government funding, which have led to development of methods of dealing with waste.

                    Comment

                    • Dave2002
                      Full Member
                      • Dec 2010
                      • 18009

                      #55
                      The UK is pretty bad about waste, but it's not alone. Many consumers just don't care - and that also includes the liberals who think they are doing OK by putting things into the "recycling" bins.

                      Why not just send it all to landfill? Well - in the UK apparently we'd fill a hole the size of Lake Windermere in under a year and a half at the current rate of waste production.

                      Comment

                      • MrGongGong
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 18357

                        #56
                        Originally posted by Dave2002 View Post
                        The UK is pretty bad about waste, but it's not alone. Many consumers just don't care - and that also includes the liberals who think they are doing OK by putting things into the "recycling" bins.

                        Why not just send it all to landfill? Well - in the UK apparently we'd fill a hole the size of Lake Windermere in under a year and a half at the current rate of waste production.
                        Pedants corner I know
                        but there is only one "Lake" in the Lake District and it isn't Windemere

                        as you were

                        Comment

                        • Dave2002
                          Full Member
                          • Dec 2010
                          • 18009

                          #57
                          Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                          Pedants corner I know
                          but there is only one "Lake" in the Lake District and it isn't Windemere

                          as you were
                          Windemere - somewhere in the USA perhaps? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windemere

                          Comment

                          • MrGongGong
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 18357

                            #58
                            Originally posted by Dave2002 View Post
                            Windemere - somewhere in the USA perhaps? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windemere


                            Whichever way it's spelt

                            Comment

                            • Eine Alpensinfonie
                              Host
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 20570

                              #59
                              Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                              Pedants corner I know
                              but there is only one "Lake" in the Lake District and it isn't Windemere

                              as you were
                              It's Bassenthwaite Lake.

                              Comment

                              • Bryn
                                Banned
                                • Mar 2007
                                • 24688

                                #60
                                Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                                Pedants corner I know
                                but there is only one "Lake" in the Lake District and it isn't Windemere

                                as you were
                                Indeed, "Lake Windermere" is a tautology, but Windermere is still a lake, just not a "Lake".

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X