Originally posted by jayne lee wilson
View Post
Is this an issue raised too high?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by jean View PostIf by an issue raised too high you mean something really not important enough for the level of interest it's received, I can ony disagree (and presume you aren't a woman)
(I think you're supposed to refer to it as WATO, ferney.)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostA woman's right to shoes?
Lowpitched voice, demanding, commanding; utility haircut & dress; money, status- and goal-oriented. Sees fashion items solely in economic terms. "In control", yet criminally furtive, on The Street ...
Woman:
Highpitched voice; imploring, pleading; helpless, passive, appealing to unconcerned strangers; decorative hair & dress; no obvious goal or status (except, for some viewing cognoscenti, "fashionista"). Sees fashion items in emotional and individually associative & affective terms. "At men's mercy", yet open-hearted, on the street(s); finally, some rueful self-awareness in the company of - a male law-enforcer.
One may easily imagine similar, role-reversed or same-sex scenarii involving Trainers, with signifiers and signifieds of widely varying valencies.Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 14-05-16, 02:55.
Comment
-
-
Richard Tarleton
Originally posted by vinteuil View Post... of course! Stupid of me
As I said earlier I don't think le Carre is ever particularly good with his female characters; he seldom gives them believably central roles.
Comment
-
Well, one might suppose that a response level of more than 50 posts reveals that this forum has provided a platform for discussion of the subject and that said discussion has not yet fallen over as one might expect some of the wearers of the more outrageously high heels to do when walking and most especially running.
Mindful of the fact that this forum is principally devoted to musical matters, I notice that the otherwise excellent pianist Yuja Wang has a habit of wearing these absurdly impractical shoes when performing; how this affects her pedalling technique must be open to question, particularly if and when she uses the sostenuto pedal in addition to those either side of it.
I imagine that most wearers of them would change them for flats when driving, which would surely be well-nigh impossible otherwise, yet I don't think that there's a dress code for taking the driving test and I cannot imagine a police officer pulling a driver to one side and delivering the admonition "you shouldn't wear high heels and drive"...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sir Velo View PostFor those who have to comply with employment contracts, it's generally a mite more tricky. Unless you thrive on the aggro of work place tribunals, possible suspensions, compromise agreements, uncertain future employment (eg why did you leave your last job? Oh, I refused to comply with their dress policy) then a little more diplomacy is usually advisable!
I did once pop into the office for a short while one afternoon on the way back from London so was dressed casually in chinos and trainers and without a tie. It felt so much better and I felt relaxed and happy to work thus dressed. Back to normal the following morning of course!"The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink
Comment
-
-
Richard Tarleton
Originally posted by Petrushka View PostMost of the women in my office come to work as if dressed for a party while us gents have to suffer the daily strangulation that is wearing a tie.
Comment
-
Richard Tarleton
In today's Sunday Times (I wouldn't know this stuff otherwise) Julia Roberts appeared on the red carpet at Cannes last week in bare feet (let them try telling her it's heels only); elsewhere, Jennifer Lawrence tripped over her heels again....as the piece says, tragic rather than appealingly feminine.....
Comment
-
Originally posted by Petrushka View Postwhile us gents have to suffer the daily strangulation that is wearing a tie.
The only times I wear a the neck noose is when going to some funerals (though one of the last ones I went to had people dressed like people and I played the squeezebox in the band while the coffin was lowered into the ground and people danced and sang in Welsh)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostDo you really "have" to wear one?
Office life is very sexist - in favour of women - but you won't find many people brave enough to stick their head above the parapet and say so. Pay is a different topic but isn't relevant where I am."The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostIt could be argued that the difference between ties (for men) and high heels (for women) is that men aren't lured into wearing ties because women thinks it makes them look sexier.
"You can't go out looking like that!"
"Why not?"
"It's untidy."
"So what?"
"At least comb your hair."
This might work ....
"You'll look like Boris Johnson ..."
"OK - I'll do the hair, at least ...."
"Then put on a clean tie...."
etc.
Re shirts ....
"Your shirt hasn't been ironed. you can't go out like that!"
"Why not - it's drip dry, it'll smooth out?"
"People will think I didn't iron them for you."
or for more PC households "People will think you're too lazy to iron your own shirts."
etc.
Comment
-
Comment