Colour...naming and perceiving

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ardcarp
    Late member
    • Nov 2010
    • 11102

    Colour...naming and perceiving

    Michael Rosen's Word of Mouth on R4 was fascinating today.

    Michael Rosen and Laura Wright on colour words, how they vary and how they have changed.


    It was billed as 'Words for Colour' but it went deeper than mere linguistics. His two guests spoke very clearly and concisely...no waffle.
  • budscott

    #2
    Excellent! The Greeks could see blue!

    Comment

    • Pabmusic
      Full Member
      • May 2011
      • 5537

      #3
      Nice programme, but it's redundant if you take an evolutionary view. We are primates (apes, actually) and therefore can see the red part of the spectrum. We know this because we have optical cones that react to the red part of the spectrum. Other mammals do not have the red cones - in general they have blue and yellow. Bulls, notoriously, don't see red (they simply don't have the red cones). Red capes mean nothing to them.

      Many birds and other lizard-type things can see red. However, most insects can't see red: but they can see ultra-violet. We have no idea what ultra-violet looks like, but we do know that if you shine UV light on flowers many of them have 'hidden' patterns. But we still don't know what UV actually looks like.

      Presumably we can see red since the primary diet of primates is fruit, mainly from forest environments. Other mammals don't do this and therefore natural selection would have selected against red. Therefore my two poodles (Low German pudelhund - puddle dog) can't see red, whereas I can.

      None of this addresses the old philosophical question of whether what I see as - say - red is what you see. Richard Dawkins speculates that bats apply a label such as the bat equivalent of 'red' or 'blue' to textures (which are important to them) in the same way we apply them to colours. It is something necessary to negotiate a way through the bat world. None of us see reality: we see only a virtual image constructed by our super-computer - our brain.
      Last edited by Pabmusic; 09-05-15, 07:20.

      Comment

      • french frank
        Administrator/Moderator
        • Feb 2007
        • 30252

        #4
        Originally posted by Pabmusic View Post
        Nice programme, but it's redundant if you take an evolutionary view.
        Not sure that that tells the whole story. Some languages don't distinguish at all between certain colours - blue and green in particular. Others have a range of words which most other languages lump together as shades of the same thing. More about language relativity as being subject to cultural influences than evolution. (But as I haven't heard the programme ... :-) - I'm just objecting to the idea that the human/evolutionary 'universalist' theory makes the relativist one 'redundant'.)
        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

        Comment

        • Gordon
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 1425

          #5
          Originally posted by french frank View Post
          .... Some languages don't distinguish at all between certain colours - blue and green in particular...
          In Welsh "glas" means either blue or green and can even mean grey in some parts of Wales! Which means that Conservatives can be confused with Greens.

          Comment

          • french frank
            Administrator/Moderator
            • Feb 2007
            • 30252

            #6
            Originally posted by Gordon View Post
            In Welsh "glas" means either blue or green and can even mean grey in some parts of Wales!
            In Old French, blo (=bleu) seems to be something like 'bruise-coloured" - blue/green/yellow/grey. And I think blue/bleu is cognate with Latin flavus = yellow.
            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

            Comment

            • vinteuil
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 12793

              #7
              ... and the Russkies, with their distinction between Oxford and Cambridge blues -

              Comment

              • french frank
                Administrator/Moderator
                • Feb 2007
                • 30252

                #8
                Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                ... and the Russkies, with their distinction between Oxford and Cambridge blues -

                http://www.nature.com/news/2007/0704...s070430-2.html
                Fascinating. I hesitated as to whether the one on the left was dark or in between.
                [Colour meter test confirms dark]
                It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                Comment

                • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                  Gone fishin'
                  • Sep 2011
                  • 30163

                  #9
                  Originally posted by french frank View Post
                  Fascinating.


                  I hesitated as to whether the one on the left was dark or in between.
                  [Colour meter test confirms dark]
                  Fascinatinger and fascinatinger! I see the left and central squares as the same colour and the right square as lighter.
                  [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                  Comment

                  • french frank
                    Administrator/Moderator
                    • Feb 2007
                    • 30252

                    #10
                    Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                    Fascinatinger and fascinatinger! I see the left and central squares as the same colour and the right square as lighter.
                    That's more or less what I meant. Except I wasn't quiiiiite sure about the one on the left. Perhaps I was thinking about it too much
                    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                    Comment

                    • ardcarp
                      Late member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 11102

                      #11
                      Originally posted by french frank View Post
                      In Old French, blo (=bleu) seems to be something like 'bruise-coloured" - blue/green/yellow/grey. And I think blue/bleu is cognate with Latin flavus = yellow.
                      Nowt to do wi' topic, but I'm reminded of the beautiful (and forward looking) Woefully Arrayed by William Cornysh where the words "my body blo and wan" are set most poignantly.

                      Passion & Resurrection / Stile Antico [2012]01 - Woefully arrayed by William Cornysh, England

                      Comment

                      • Anastasius
                        Full Member
                        • Mar 2015
                        • 1842

                        #12
                        Many, many years ago the BBC Engineering Training Department had a very elegant colorimeter experiment. It was a light box separated into two halves so that the illuminating light was the same for both halves. A single slider on the left half could have various colour filter materials inserted. The right half had three sliders with primary red, green and blue with a calibrated scale. The test was to adjust the sliders in the right half so that the mixed colour as seen in the two viewing windows was the same for the two halves. The required R, G and B values were then noted down and compared with others. It was very surprising to see the wide differences between people's own colour perceptions.
                        Fewer Smart things. More smart people.

                        Comment

                        • budscott

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Pabmusic View Post
                          None of us see reality: we see only a virtual image constructed by our super-computer - our brain.
                          Why worry? It probably ain't out there!

                          Comment

                          • Eine Alpensinfonie
                            Host
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 20570

                            #14
                            Do you think of turquoise as being blue or green?

                            Comment

                            • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                              Gone fishin'
                              • Sep 2011
                              • 30163

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                              Do you think of turquoise as being blue or green?
                              I think of it as being turquoise.
                              [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X