A year or so ago - or maybe two - I ranted colourfully on the Stormy Weather board, I think it was, about an experience I had of shopping for clothes in, as it happened, Sainsbury's, although it could have been virtually any one of our chain clothiers. What I described was aisle upon aisle of female clobber, in all patterns, shapes, sizes, styles, materials and colours, followed by three aisles of children's wear, two of them in pink for, guess which gender? - and ending in just two rows of male attire. One half of one aisle consisted of two-piece suits in dark grey, almost black, this being the only choice of formal attire. The rest of the for-males to consider consisted mainly of puffa jackets, and sweat and T-shirts in mostly black, grey, navy blue or dull maroon, and I remembered the 1960s and 70s when some of the barriers of gender-based sartoriality were being broken down, both as regards the similar range of clothings available for men as for women making shopping such an exciting, colour-filled experience, as well of course as hair growth being equally espoused (no pun). Gay men had undoubtedly led the trend - one remembers pink shirts for blokes becoming acceptable somewhere around 1963 - but there was no need to be gay before going for the softer look that was one of the options back then. (You could also be as macho off the peg as you liked, of course, but that did not automatically mean short back-and-sides and leather jackets; whatever happened to knitted ties??) Then yesterday I wandered around that clothes section once more, and found to my dismay that little had changed in the last two years, choice being as limited as ever for the male half of the population.
Then just now I spotted Grayson Perry's article in last week's New Statesman, and it not only summed up a few dawning ideas of my own that reminded me of the heady days when feminism was what it said on the tin, but brought to mind some of the issues John Berger touched on in his early 1970s TV series "Ways of Seeing" about how gender stereotyping represents and contributes to maintaining power relations within capitalism, and how this manifests.
Here is Grayson's article - I just thought it worthwhile to share it as an observational perspective without expecting many replies here , if any:
Then just now I spotted Grayson Perry's article in last week's New Statesman, and it not only summed up a few dawning ideas of my own that reminded me of the heady days when feminism was what it said on the tin, but brought to mind some of the issues John Berger touched on in his early 1970s TV series "Ways of Seeing" about how gender stereotyping represents and contributes to maintaining power relations within capitalism, and how this manifests.
Here is Grayson's article - I just thought it worthwhile to share it as an observational perspective without expecting many replies here , if any:
Comment