Most of us on the Forum have a high degree of knowledge of the record catalogue and have long ago decided on our favourite versions of the work under review, so we aren't the target audience for BaL in the way we were when impecunious students deciding how best to spend our hard-earned cash, in my case back in the early 1970s.
I rarely listen to the programme now, but do so if the subject is a work I don't know well (or at all) and want to know more. The last one I heard was Sarah Willis doing the honours with the Strauss Horn Concerto No 2, a brilliant programme that completely fulfilled expectations.
The sheer volume of recordings of the classical repertoire now available renders the entire format of BaL as outdated and absurd. How can a 45 minute slot on, say, a Tchaikovsky or Beethoven symphony come to any meaningful conclusion about a 'winner'?
Having said that, I still think there is a place on Radio 3 for a comparative review programme that helps give guidance to those in the same position as I was 50 years ago but the BaL format as it stands now isn't it. Perhaps an 'Interpretations on Record' kind of programme, taken out of 'Record Review', without the concept of a 'winner' and given to a broadcaster with some authority on the work might fulfil these requirements?
I rarely listen to the programme now, but do so if the subject is a work I don't know well (or at all) and want to know more. The last one I heard was Sarah Willis doing the honours with the Strauss Horn Concerto No 2, a brilliant programme that completely fulfilled expectations.
The sheer volume of recordings of the classical repertoire now available renders the entire format of BaL as outdated and absurd. How can a 45 minute slot on, say, a Tchaikovsky or Beethoven symphony come to any meaningful conclusion about a 'winner'?
Having said that, I still think there is a place on Radio 3 for a comparative review programme that helps give guidance to those in the same position as I was 50 years ago but the BaL format as it stands now isn't it. Perhaps an 'Interpretations on Record' kind of programme, taken out of 'Record Review', without the concept of a 'winner' and given to a broadcaster with some authority on the work might fulfil these requirements?
Comment